Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kobi Boymgold

dblp:243/5870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 70% Systems and software security · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security › security education
security awareness
0.412020
Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Users · CHI 2020
Usable security
social engineering
0.412020
Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Users · CHI 2020
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability assessment
0.412020
Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Users · CHI 2020
Usable security
user behavior
0.112020
Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Users · CHI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4questionnaire · 0.4network traffic monitoring · 0.4mobile agents · 0.4cybersecurity challenges · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Users
abstract
Information security awareness (ISA) is a practice focused on the set of skills which help a user successfully mitigate social engineering (SE) attacks. Evaluating the ISA of users is crucial, since early identification of users who are more vulnerable to SE attacks improves system security. Previous studies for evaluating the ISA of smartphone users rely on subjective data sources (questionnaires) and do not address the differences between classes of SE attacks. This paper presents a framework for evaluating the ISA of smartphone users for specific attack classes. In addition to questionnaires, we utilize objective data sources: a mobile agent, a network traffic monitor, and cybersecurity challenges. We evaluated the framework by conducting a long-term user study involving 162 users. The results show that: the self-reported behavior of users differs significantly from their actual behavior and the ISA level derived from the actual behavior of users is highly correlated with their ability to mitigate SE attacks.
Ron Biton, Kobi Boymgold, Rami Puzis, Asaf Shabtai
CHI2