Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keivan Dabiri

dblp:243/6729 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-9484-6741ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 30% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 30% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › domain-specific accelerator › optimization accelerator
combinatorial optimization accelerator
0.412020
Replica Exchange MCMC Hardware With Automatic Temperature Selection and Parallel Trial · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator
0.412020
Replica Exchange MCMC Hardware With Automatic Temperature Selection and Parallel Trial · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Emerging computing paradigms › unconventional computing
ising machine
0.412020
Replica Exchange MCMC Hardware With Automatic Temperature Selection and Parallel Trial · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance evaluation methodology
simulation and benchmarking
0.112020
Replica Exchange MCMC Hardware With Automatic Temperature Selection and Parallel Trial · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.4replica exchange markov chain monte carlo · 0.4parallel energy evaluation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Replica Exchange MCMC Hardware With Automatic Temperature Selection and Parallel Trial
abstract
A replica exchange Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) engine is developed with automatic temperature adjustment for solving combinatorial optimization problems by minimizing the energy of the Ising model. The automatic temperature adjustment scheme ensures that the MCMC process is optimized at every stage of the execution. This approach is performed by dynamically adjusting temperatures of all replicas, based on the properties of any given problem, in addition to the capability of automatically inserting new replicas or removing any existing replicas to achieve the best possible resource efficiency and execution time. The proposed algorithm is integrated with parallel evaluation of energy increment and update scheme. The engine is implemented on the FPGA platform with a capacity of running up to 42 replicas in pipeline, each running 1024 fully-connected Ising spins in parallel. The performance of the hardware is examined with three different classes of problems, Vertex Cover, Maximum-Cut, and Travelling Salesman using the engine in three modes, simulated annealing, with replica exchange while the adjustments are turned on or off. Up to 16x speedup is observed by turning on the replica exchange capability in addition to the advantage of eliminating the challenging process of finding an optimal annealing schedule for simulated annealing process.
Keivan Dabiri, Mehrdad Malekmohammadi, Ali Sheikholeslami, Hirotaka Tamura
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2019 Digitally Annealed Solution for the Vertex Cover Problem with Application in Cyber Security
abstract
Cyber attacks on the power systems can mislead the control center to produce incorrect state and topology estimate. State and topology attacks can have harmful impacts on the operation of a power system. The problem of placing secure phasor measurement units (PMUs) to detect these attacks has been studied in the literature. Specifically, it has been shown that placing secure PMUs to disable undetectable state and topology attacks can enhance the security of the system against cyber attacks. Placing secure PMUs is indeed the minimum vertex cover problem. Since the cost of deploying PMUs is high, it is important to place the secure PMUs efficiently in order to maximize the ability of detecting cyber attacks while reducing the costs. In this paper, we use Digital Annealer to solve the vertex cover problem. Digital Annealer is a hardware architecture for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We have performed numerous numerical experiments and noticed that our approach has an enhanced level of optimality compared to other well-known alternatives in the literature.
Mohammad Javad-Kalbasi, Keivan Dabiri, Shahrokh Valaee, Ali Sheikholeslami
ICASSP2