Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yantao Gong
dblp:243/9055
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 77% Wireless sensing and localization · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intent detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss · AAAI 2022 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Demo Abstract: Perception vs. Reality - Never Believe in What You See · IPSN 2020 |
Wireless sensing and localization
RF-based localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Demo Abstract: Perception vs. Reality - Never Believe in What You See · IPSN 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hyperspherical space projection · 0.6accuracy-uncertainty loss · 0.6radio localization · 0.4image processing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty LossabstractData-driven methods have achieved notable performance on intent detection, which is a task to comprehend user queries. Nonetheless, they are controversial for over-confident predictions. In some scenarios, users do not only care about the accuracy but also the confidence of model. Unfortunately, mainstream neural networks are poorly calibrated, with a large gap between accuracy and confidence. To handle this problem defined as confidence calibration, we propose a model using the hyperspherical space and rebalanced accuracy-uncertainty loss. Specifically, we project the label vector onto hyperspherical space uniformly to generate a dense label representation matrix, which mitigates over-confident predictions due to overfitting sparse one-hot label matrix. Besides, we rebalance samples of different accuracy and uncertainty to better guide model training. Experiments on the open datasets verify that our model outperforms the existing calibration methods and achieves a significant improvement on the calibration metric. Yantao Gong, Cao Liu, Fan Yang 0087, Guanglu Wan, Jiansong Chen, Houfeng Wang |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Density-Based Dynamic Curriculum Learning for Intent DetectionabstractPre-trained language models have achieved noticeable performance on the intent detection task. However, due to assigning an identical weight to each sample, they suffer from the overfitting of simple samples and the failure to learn complex samples well. To handle this problem, we propose a density-based dynamic curriculum learning model. Our model defines the sample's difficulty level according to their eigenvectors' density. In this way, we exploit the overall distribution of all samples' eigenvectors simultaneously. Then we apply a dynamic curriculum learning strategy, which pays distinct attention to samples of various difficulty levels and alters the proportion of samples during the training process. Through the above operation, simple samples are well-trained, and complex samples are enhanced. Experiments on three open datasets verify that the proposed density-based algorithm can distinguish simple and complex samples significantly. Besides, our model obtains obvious improvement over the strong baselines. Yantao Gong, Cao Liu, Jiazhen Yuan, Fan Yang 0087, Guanglu Wan, Jiansong Chen, Ruiyao Niu, Houfeng Wang |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2020 | Demo Abstract: Perception vs. Reality - Never Believe in What You SeeabstractThe increasing availability of heterogeneous ambient sensing systems challenges the according information processing systems to analyse and compare a variety of different systems in a single scenario. For instance, localization of objects can be performed by image processing systems as well as by radio based localization. If such systems are utilized to localize the same objects, synergy of the outputs is important to enable comparable and meaningful analysis. This demo showcases the practical deployment and challenges of such an example system. Yunfeng Huang, Fang-Jing Wu, Christian Hakert, Georg von der Brüggen, Kuan-Hsun Chen, Jian-Jia Chen, Patrick Böcker, Petr Chernikov, Luis Cruz 0006, Zeyi Duan, Ahmed Gheith, Yantao Gong, Anand Gopalan, Karthik Prakash, Ammar Tauqir |
IPSN | 12 |