Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Kreitzberg

dblp:244/2175 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
marginal inference
0.512021
On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.512021
On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Algorithms and data structures
convolution
0.512021
On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trimmed p-convolution tree · 1.0max-convolution · 1.0cartesian product trees · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 On Solving Probabilistic Linear Diophantine Equations
abstract
Multiple methods exist for computing marginals involving a linear Diophantine constraint on random variables. Each of these extant methods has some limitation on the dimension and support or on the type of marginal computed (e.g., sum-product inference, max-product inference, maximum a posteriori, etc.). Here, we introduce the "trimmed $p$-convolution tree'" an approach that generalizes the applicability of the existing methods and achieves a runtime within a $\log$-factor or better compared to the best existing methods. A second form of trimming we call underflow/overflow trimming is introduced which aggregates events which land outside the supports for a random variable into the nearest support. Trimmed $p$-convolution trees with and without underflow/overflow trimming are used in different protein inference models. Then two different methods of approximating max-convolution using Cartesian product trees are introduced.
Patrick Kreitzberg, Oliver Serang
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1