Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Berkay Turan
dblp:244/2422
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 87% Learning theory · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Feature and Parameter Selection in Stochastic Linear Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › linear bandits
stochastic linear bandits |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Feature and Parameter Selection in Stochastic Linear Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Feature and Parameter Selection in Stochastic Linear Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reduction from bandits to full-information problems · 0.6bandit convex optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Directional Optimism for Safe Linear BanditsabstractThe safe linear bandit problem is a version of the classical stochastic linear bandit problem where the learner’s actions must satisfy an uncertain constraint at all rounds. Due its applicability to many real-world settings, this problem has received considerable attention in recent years. By leveraging a novel approach that we call directional optimism, we find that it is possible to achieve improved regret guarantees for both well-separated problem instances and action sets that are finite star convex sets. Furthermore, we propose a novel algorithm for this setting that improves on existing algorithms in terms of empirical performance, while enjoying matching regret guarantees. Lastly, we introduce a generalization of the safe linear bandit setting where the constraints are convex and adapt our algorithms and analyses to this setting by leveraging a novel convex-analysis based approach. Spencer Hutchinson, Berkay Turan, Mahnoosh Alizadeh |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2022 | Feature and Parameter Selection in Stochastic Linear BanditsabstractWe study two model selection settings in stochastic linear bandits (LB). In the first setting, which we refer to as feature selection, the expected reward of the LB problem is in the linear span of at least one of $M$ feature maps (models). In the second setting, the reward parameter of the LB problem is arbitrarily selected from $M$ models represented as (possibly) overlapping balls in $\mathbb R^d$. However, the agent only has access to misspecified models, i.e., estimates of the centers and radii of the balls. We refer to this setting as parameter selection. For each setting, we develop and analyze a computationally efficient algorithm that is based on a reduction from bandits to full-information problems. This allows us to obtain regret bounds that are not worse (up to a $\sqrt{\log M}$ factor) than the case where the true model is known. This is the best reported dependence on the number of models $M$ in these settings. Finally, we empirically show the effectiveness of our algorithms using synthetic and real-world experiments. Ahmadreza Moradipari, Berkay Turan, Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Mahnoosh Alizadeh, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh |
ICML | 2 |