Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryumei Nakada

dblp:244/2613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-9888-7472ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 41% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20% Language models and text generation · 18%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
1.822026
PEANuT: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation with Weight-aware Neural Tweakers · KDD (1) 2026
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
foundation model adaptation
1.012026
PEANuT: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation with Weight-aware Neural Tweakers · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.812024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.812024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.812024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
sparse fine-tuning
0.812024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
structured sparsity
0.812024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.712023
The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.412020
Adaptive Approximation and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Intrinsic Dimensionality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension
0.412020
Adaptive Approximation and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Intrinsic Dimensionality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.212024
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.212023
The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality
0.112020
Adaptive Approximation and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Intrinsic Dimensionality · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural tweaker modules · 1.0low-rank adaptation · 1.0structured sparse fine-tuning · 0.8partial back-propagation · 0.8adapter fusion · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.7minkowski dimension · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PEANuT: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation with Weight-aware Neural Tweakers
abstract
Fine-tuning large pre-trained foundation models often yields excellent downstream performance but is prohibitively expensive when updating all parameters. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as LoRA alleviate this by introducing lightweight update modules, yet they commonly rely on weight-agnostic linear approximations, limiting their expressiveness. In this work, we propose PEANuT, a novel PEFT framework that introduces weight-aware neural tweakers, compact neural modules that generate task-adaptive updates conditioned on frozen pre-trained weights. PEANuT provides a flexible yet efficient way to capture complex update patterns without full model tuning. We theoretically show that PEANuT achieves equivalent or greater expressivity than existing linear PEFT methods with comparable or fewer parameters. Extensive experiments across four benchmarks with over twenty datasets demonstrate that PEANuT consistently outperforms strong baselines in both NLP and vision tasks, while maintaining low computational overhead.
Yibo Zhong, Haoxiang Jiang, Lincan Li, Ryumei Nakada, Tianci Liu 0003, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Haoyu Wang 0004
KDD (1)4
2024 S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity
abstract
Current PEFT methods for LLMs can achieve high quality, efficient training, or scalable serving, but not all three simultaneously. To address this limitation, we investigate sparse fine-tuning and observe a remarkable improvement in generalization ability. Utilizing this key insight, we propose a family of Structured Sparse Fine-Tuning (S${^2}$FT) methods for LLMs, which concurrently achieve state-of-the-art fine-tuning performance, training efficiency, and inference scalability. S${^2}$FT accomplishes this by "selecting sparsely and computing densely". Based on the coupled structures in LLMs, \model selects a few attention heads and channels in the MHA and FFN modules for each Transformer block, respectively. Next, it co-permutes the weight matrices on both sides of all coupled structures to connect the selected subsets in each layer into a dense submatrix. Finally, S${^2}$FT performs in-place gradient updates on all selected submatrices. Through theoretical analyses and empirical results, our method prevents forgetting while simplifying optimization, delivers SOTA performance on both commonsense and arithmetic reasoning with 4.6% and 1.3% average improvements compared to LoRA, and surpasses full FT by 11.5% when generalizing to various domains after instruction tuning. Using our partial back-propagation algorithm, S${^2}$FT saves training memory up to 3$\times$ and improves latency by 1.5-2.7$\times$ compared to full FT, while achieving an average 10\% improvement over LoRA on both metrics. We further demonstrate that the weight updates in S${^2}$FT can be decoupled into adapters, enabling effective fusion, fast switch, and efficient parallelism when serving multiple fine-tuned models.
Jixuan Leng, Geyang Guo, Ryumei Nakada, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Beidi Chen
NeurIPS5
2023 Understanding Multimodal Contrastive Learning and Incorporating Unpaired Data
abstract
Language-supervised vision models have recently attracted great attention in computer vision. A common approach to build such models is to use contrastive learning on paired data across the two modalities, as exemplified by Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training (CLIP). In this paper, (i) we initiate the investigation of a general class of nonlinear loss functions for multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) including CLIP loss and show its connection to singular value decomposition (SVD). Namely, we show that each step of loss minimization by gradient descent can be seen as performing SVD on a contrastive cross-covariance matrix. Based on this insight, (ii) we analyze the performance of MMCL under linear representation settings. We quantitatively show that the feature learning ability of MMCL can be better than that of unimodal contrastive learning applied to each modality even under the presence of wrongly matched pairs. This characterizes the robustness of MMCL to noisy data. Furthermore, when we have access to additional unpaired data, (iii) we propose a new MMCL loss that incorporates additional unpaired datasets. We show that the algorithm can detect the ground-truth pairs and improve performance by fully exploiting unpaired datasets. The performance of the proposed algorithm was verified by numerical experiments.
Ryumei Nakada, Halil Ibrahim Gulluk, Zhun Deng, Wenlong Ji, James Zou 0001, Linjun Zhang
AISTATS1
2023 The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysis
abstract
Contrastive learning has achieved state-of-the-art performance in various self-supervised learning tasks and even outperforms its supervised counterpart. Despite its empirical success, theoretical understanding of the superiority of contrastive learning is still limited. In this paper, under linear representation settings, (i) we provably show that contrastive learning outperforms the standard autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, two classical generative unsupervised learning methods, for both feature recovery and in-domain downstream tasks; (ii) we also illustrate the impact of labeled data in supervised contrastive learning. This provides theoretical support for recent findings that contrastive learning with labels improves the performance of learned representations in the in-domain downstream task, but it can harm the performance in transfer learning. We verify our theory with numerical experiments.
Wenlong Ji, Zhun Deng, Ryumei Nakada, James Zou 0001, Linjun Zhang
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Adaptive Approximation and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Intrinsic Dimensionality
abstract
In this study, we prove that an intrinsic low dimensionality of covariates is the main factor that determines the performance of deep neural networks (DNNs). DNNs generally provide outstanding empirical performance. Hence, numerous studies have actively investigated the theoretical properties of DNNs to understand their underlying mechanisms. In particular, the behavior of DNNs in terms of high-dimensional data is one of the most critical questions. However, this issue has not been sufficiently investigated from the aspect of covariates, although high-dimensional data have practically low intrinsic dimensionality. In this study, we derive bounds for an approximation error and a generalization error regarding DNNs with intrinsically low dimensional covariates. We apply the notion of the Minkowski dimension and develop a novel proof technique. Consequently, we show that convergence rates of the errors by DNNs do not depend on the nominal high dimensionality of data, but on its lower intrinsic dimension. We further prove that the rate is optimal in the minimax sense. We identify an advantage of DNNs by showing that DNNs can handle a broader class of intrinsic low dimensional data than other adaptive estimators. Finally, we conduct a numerical simulation to validate the theoretical results.
Ryumei Nakada, Masaaki Imaizumi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1