Intelligent virtual agents have tremendous potential for facilitating collaborative learning by modeling and reinforcing desirable collaborative practices. Despite recent work in this area, the extent to which intelligent virtual agents can facilitate improvements in the collaborative behavior of children is largely unknown. This study employed a wizard-of-oz study design and investigated elementary children's collaborative behavior after interacting with virtual agents. These agents model exploratory talk for upper elementary school dyads, such as asking higher-order questions and listening to their partners. The findings uncover associations between elementary learner dyads' positive changes in collaboration after agent interventions, the dyads' affective reactions to interventions, and their attentiveness to the agents. Our results also reveal associations between positive changes in collaboration and the timing of interventions: for example, earlier interventions had a higher occurrence of positive changes, and positive changes in collaboration typically happened within five seconds of interventions. The results suggest ways in which intelligent virtual agents may be used to promote effective collaborative learning practices for children.

Use-Modify-Create (UMC) has gained recognition as a viable scaffolding approach for student programming activities, but little is known about how UMC could support CS learning in game-based learning environments. We designed and developed a game to teach middle grade students (ages 11-13) CS through block-based programming challenges. The game integrates a UMC pedagogical framework to promote successful student outcomes for a wide variety of student abilities, including those without prior programming experience. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, we investigated how the game influenced student learning of CS concepts and the role of UMC on the problem-solving strategies students applied to complete the game. In particular, we were interested in how prior experience would moderate these outcomes. Results from a multilevel model of students' pre-and post-assessment scores (N = 77) on a CS concepts assessment indicated that all students, regardless of prior programming experience, showed significant learning gains from pre to post after playing the game. Qualitative results revealed that the UMC scaffolding progression provided students, particularly those with little to no prior programming experience, with the foundational knowledge needed to progress through the game levels and challenges. Specifically, we found that the Use phases of the game reduced novice students' cognitive load and facilitated the necessary CS conceptual understanding to solve the open-ended programming tasks encountered in the game's Modify and Create phases. Our findings demonstrate the efficacy of UMC to support the learning of novice programmers in a game-based learning environment while not to the detriment of those more experienced.

Block-based programming environments are widely used in computer science education. However, these environments pose significant challenges for student modeling. Given a series of problem-solving actions taken by students in block-based programming environments, student models need to accurately infer problem-solving students’ programming abilities in real time to enable adaptive feedback and hints that are tailored to students’ abilities. While student models for block-based programming offer the potential to support student-adaptivity, creating student models for these environments is challenging because students can develop a broad range of solutions to a given programming activity. To address these challenges, we introduce a progression trajectory-based student modeling framework for modeling novice student block-based programming across multiple learning activities. Student trajectories utilize a time series representation that employs code analysis to incrementally compare student programs to expert solutions as students undertake block-based programming activities. This paper reports on a study in which progression trajectories were collected from more than 100 undergraduate students engaging in a series of block-based programming activities in an introductory computer science course. Using progression trajectory-based student modeling, we identified three distinct trajectory classes: Early Quitting, High Persistence, and Efficient Completion. Analysis of these trajectories revealed that they exhibit significantly different characteristics with respect to students’ actions and can be used to accurately predict students’ programming behaviors on future programming activities compared to competing baseline models. The findings suggest that progression trajectory-based student models can accurately model students’ block-based programming problem solving and hold potential for informing adaptive support in block-based programming environments.

Computational Thinking (CT) is being infused into curricula in a variety of core K-12 STEM courses. As these topics are being introduced to students without prior programming experience and are potentially taught by instructors unfamiliar with programming and CT, appropriate lesson design might help support both students and teachers. "Use-Modify-Create" (UMC), a CT lesson progression, has students ease into CT topics by first "Using" a given artifact, "Modifying" an existing one, and then eventually "Creating" new ones. While studies have presented lessons adopting and adapting this progression and advocating for its use, few have focused on evaluating UMC's pedagogical effectiveness and claims. We present a comparison study between two CT lesson progressions for middle school science classes. Students participated in a 4-day activity focused on developing an agent-based simulation in a block-based programming environment. While some classrooms had students develop code on days 2-4, others used a scaffolded lesson plan modeled after the UMC framework. Through analyzing student's exit tickets, classroom observations, and teacher interviews, we illustrate differences in perception of assignment difficulty from both the students and teachers, as well as student perception of artifact "ownership" between conditions.