Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenyi He

dblp:244/5587 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-9141-3712ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
1.012026
WeaveRec: An LLM-Based Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation Framework with Model Merging · WWW 2026
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
cross-domain sequential recommendation
1.012026
WeaveRec: An LLM-Based Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation Framework with Model Merging · WWW 2026
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation
1.012026
WeaveRec: An LLM-Based Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation Framework with Model Merging · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model merging · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 WeaveRec: An LLM-Based Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation Framework with Model Merging
abstract
Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation (CDSR) seeks to improve user preference modeling by transferring knowledge from multiple domains. Despite the progress made in CDSR, most existing methods rely on overlapping users or items to establish cross-domain correlations-a requirement that rarely holds in real-world settings. The advent of large language models (LLM) and model-merging techniques appears to overcome this limitation by unifying multi-domain data without explicit overlaps. Yet, our empirical study shows that naively training an LLM on combined domains—or simply merging several domain-specific LLMs—often degrades performance relative to a model trained solely on the target domain.
Min Hou 0004, Le Wu 0001, Chenyi He, Hao Liu 0078, Zhi Li 0057, Xin Li 0064, Si Wei
WWW4