Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bruce J. Wittmann

dblp:244/5619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8144-9157ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 54% Optimization for machine learning · 16% Reinforcement learning · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design
0.912025
Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein fitness optimization
0.912025
Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.812024
CARE: a Benchmark Suite for the Classification and Retrieval of Enzymes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.312025
Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.312025
Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212024
CARE: a Benchmark Suite for the Classification and Retrieval of Enzymes · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thompson sampling · 1.7protein language model · 1.7posterior sampling · 1.7classifier guidance · 1.7contrastive reaction-enzyme pretraining · 1.5CLIPZyme · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness Optimization
abstract
Protein fitness optimization involves finding a protein sequence that maximizes desired quantitative properties in a combinatorially large design space of possible sequences. Recent advances in steering protein generative models (e.g., diffusion models and language models) with labeled data offer a promising approach. However, most previous studies have optimized surrogate rewards and/or utilized large amounts of labeled data for steering, making it unclear how well existing methods perform and compare to each other in real-world optimization campaigns where fitness is measured through low-throughput wet-lab assays. In this study, we explore fitness optimization using small amounts (hundreds) of labeled sequence-fitness pairs and comprehensively evaluate strategies such as classifier guidance and posterior sampling for guiding generation from different discrete diffusion models of protein sequences. We also demonstrate how guidance can be integrated into adaptive sequence selection akin to Thompson sampling in Bayesian optimization, showing that plug-and-play guidance strategies offer advantages over alternatives such as reinforcement learning with protein language models. Overall, we provide practical insights into how to effectively steer modern generative models for next-generation protein fitness optimization.
Wenda Chu, Daniel Khalil, Raul Astudillo, Bruce J. Wittmann, Frances H. Arnold, Yisong Yue
NeurIPS5
2024 CARE: a Benchmark Suite for the Classification and Retrieval of Enzymes
abstract
Enzymes are important proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. In recent years, machine learning methods have emerged to predict enzyme function from sequence; however, there are no standardized benchmarks to evaluate these methods. We introduce CARE, a benchmark and dataset suite for the Classification And Retrieval of Enzymes (CARE). CARE centers on two tasks: (1) classification of a protein sequence by its enzyme commission (EC) number and (2) retrieval of an EC number given a chemical reaction. For each task, we design train-test splits to evaluate different kinds of out-of-distribution generalization that are relevant to real use cases. For the classification task, we provide baselines for state-of-the-art methods. Because the retrieval task has not been previously formalized, we propose a method called Contrastive Reaction-EnzymE Pretraining (CREEP) as one of the first baselines for this task and compare it to the recent method, CLIPZyme. CARE is available at https://github.com/jsunn-y/CARE/.
Ariane Mora, Shengchao Liu, Bruce J. Wittmann, Anima Anandkumar, Frances H. Arnold, Yisong Yue
NeurIPS4