Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wen-Jing Zhou

dblp:244/8706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5154-6156ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › peptide sequencing
de novo peptide sequencing
0.412019
pNovo 3: precise de novo peptide sequencing using a learning-to-rank framework · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.412019
pNovo 3: precise de novo peptide sequencing using a learning-to-rank framework · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning to rank · 0.4deep learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 pNovo 3: precise de novo peptide sequencing using a learning-to-rank framework
abstract
MOTIVATION: De novo peptide sequencing based on tandem mass spectrometry data is the key technology of shotgun proteomics for identifying peptides without any database and assembling unknown proteins. However, owing to the low ion coverage in tandem mass spectra, the order of certain consecutive amino acids cannot be determined if all of their supporting fragment ions are missing, which results in the low precision of de novo sequencing. RESULTS: In order to solve this problem, we developed pNovo 3, which used a learning-to-rank framework to distinguish similar peptide candidates for each spectrum. Three metrics for measuring the similarity between each experimental spectrum and its corresponding theoretical spectrum were used as important features, in which the theoretical spectra can be precisely predicted by the pDeep algorithm using deep learning. On seven benchmark datasets from six diverse species, pNovo 3 recalled 29-102% more correct spectra, and the precision was 11-89% higher than three other state-of-the-art de novo sequencing algorithms. Furthermore, compared with the newly developed DeepNovo, which also used the deep learning approach, pNovo 3 still identified 21-50% more spectra on the nine datasets used in the study of DeepNovo. In summary, the deep learning and learning-to-rank techniques implemented in pNovo 3 significantly improve the precision of de novo sequencing, and such machine learning framework is worth extending to other related research fields to distinguish the similar sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: pNovo 3 can be freely downloaded from http://pfind.ict.ac.cn/software/pNovo/index.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hao Chi, Wen-Feng Zeng, Wen-Jing Zhou, Simin He 0001
Bioinform.4