Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas Sterge

dblp:244/9820 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 70% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.612022
Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
kernel principal component analysis
0.612022
Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
nyström method
0.612022
Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features
0.212022
Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical minimax analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA
abstract
Kernel methods provide an elegant framework for developing nonlinear learning algorithms from simple linear methods. Though these methods have superior empirical performance in several real data applications, their usefulness is inhibited by the significant computational burden incurred in large sample situations. Various approximation schemes have been proposed in the literature to alleviate these computational issues, and the approximate kernel machines are shown to retain the empirical performance. However, the theoretical properties of these approximate kernel machines are less well understood. In this work, we theoretically study the trade-off between computational complexity and statistical accuracy in Nystrom approximate kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), wherein we show that the Nystrom approximate KPCA matches the statistical performance of (non-approximate) KPCA while remaining computationally beneficial. Additionally, we show that Nystrom approximate KPCA outperforms the statistical behavior of another popular approximation scheme, the random feature approximation, when applied to KPCA.
Nicholas Sterge, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2020 Gain with no Pain: Efficiency of Kernel-PCA by Nyström Sampling
abstract
In this paper, we analyze a Nyström based approach to efficient large scale kernel principal component analysis (PCA). The latter is a natural nonlinear extension of classical PCA based on considering a nonlinear feature map or the corresponding kernel. Like other kernel approaches, kernel PCA enjoys good mathematical and statistical properties but, numerically, it scales poorly with the sample size. Our analysis shows that Nyström sampling greatly improves computational efficiency without incurring any loss of statistical accuracy. While similar effects have been observed in supervised learning, this is the first such result for PCA. Our theoretical findings are based on a combination of analytic and concentration of measure techniques. Our study is more broadly motivated by the question of understanding the interplay between statistical and computational requirements for learning.
Nicholas Sterge, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Lorenzo Rosasco, Alessandro Rudi
AISTATS1