Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Sterge
dblp:244/9820
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 70% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
kernel principal component analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
nyström method |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCA · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical minimax analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Statistical Optimality and Computational Efficiency of Nystrom Kernel PCAabstractKernel methods provide an elegant framework for developing nonlinear learning algorithms from simple linear methods. Though these methods have superior empirical performance in several real data applications, their usefulness is inhibited by the significant computational burden incurred in large sample situations. Various approximation schemes have been proposed in the literature to alleviate these computational issues, and the approximate kernel machines are shown to retain the empirical performance. However, the theoretical properties of these approximate kernel machines are less well understood. In this work, we theoretically study the trade-off between computational complexity and statistical accuracy in Nystrom approximate kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), wherein we show that the Nystrom approximate KPCA matches the statistical performance of (non-approximate) KPCA while remaining computationally beneficial. Additionally, we show that Nystrom approximate KPCA outperforms the statistical behavior of another popular approximation scheme, the random feature approximation, when applied to KPCA. Nicholas Sterge, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Gain with no Pain: Efficiency of Kernel-PCA by Nyström SamplingabstractIn this paper, we analyze a Nyström based approach to efficient large scale kernel principal component analysis (PCA). The latter is a natural nonlinear extension of classical PCA based on considering a nonlinear feature map or the corresponding kernel. Like other kernel approaches, kernel PCA enjoys good mathematical and statistical properties but, numerically, it scales poorly with the sample size. Our analysis shows that Nyström sampling greatly improves computational efficiency without incurring any loss of statistical accuracy. While similar effects have been observed in supervised learning, this is the first such result for PCA. Our theoretical findings are based on a combination of analytic and concentration of measure techniques. Our study is more broadly motivated by the question of understanding the interplay between statistical and computational requirements for learning. Nicholas Sterge, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Lorenzo Rosasco, Alessandro Rudi |
AISTATS | 1 |