Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maureen de Seyssel

dblp:245/0035 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2345-5676ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 35% Machine translation · 33% Language models and text generation · 17%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
layer-wise representation analysis
0.912025
Discriminating Form and Meaning in Multilingual Models with Minimal-Pair ABX Tasks · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.912025
Discriminating Form and Meaning in Multilingual Models with Minimal-Pair ABX Tasks · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation
0.912025
Toward Machine Interpreting: Lessons from Human Interpreting Studies · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
speech-to-speech translation
0.812024
EmphAssess : a Prosodic Benchmark on Assessing Emphasis Transfer in Speech-to-Speech Models · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 0.9ABX discrimination tasks · 0.9prosodic benchmark · 0.8emphasis classification · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discriminating Form and Meaning in Multilingual Models with Minimal-Pair ABX Tasks
abstract
We introduce a set of training-free ABX-style discrimination tasks to evaluate how multilingual language models represent language identity (form) and semantic content (meaning).Inspired by speech processing, these zero-shot tasks measure whether minimal differences in representation can be reliably detected.This offers a flexible and interpretable alternative to probing.Applied to XLM-R (Conneau et al., 2020a) across pretraining checkpoints and layers, we find that language discrimination declines over training and becomes concentrated in lower layers, while meaning discrimination strengthens over time and stabilizes in deeper layers.We then explore probing tasks, showing some alignment between our metrics and linguistic learning performance.Our results position ABX tasks as a lightweight framework for analyzing the structure of multilingual representations.
Maureen de Seyssel, Jie Chi, Skyler Seto, Maartje ter Hoeve, Masha Fedzechkina, Natalie Schluter
EMNLP1
2025 Toward Machine Interpreting: Lessons from Human Interpreting Studies
abstract
Current speech translation systems, while having achieved impressive accuracies, are rather static in their behavior and do not adapt to realworld situations in ways human interpreters do.In order to improve their practical usefulness and enable interpreting-like experiences, a precise understanding of the nature of human interpreting is crucial.To this end, we discuss human interpreting literature from the perspective of the machine translation field, while considering both operational and qualitative aspects.We identify implications for the development of speech translation systems and argue that there is great potential to adopt many human interpreting principles using recent modeling techniques.We hope that our findings provide inspiration for closing the perceived usability gap, and can motivate progress toward true machine interpreting.
Matthias Sperber, Maureen de Seyssel, Jiajun Bao, Matthias Paulik
EMNLP2
2024 EmphAssess : a Prosodic Benchmark on Assessing Emphasis Transfer in Speech-to-Speech Models
abstract
We introduce EmphAssess, a prosodic benchmark designed to evaluate the capability of speech-to-speech models to encode and reproduce prosodic emphasis.We apply this to two tasks: speech resynthesis and speech-to-speech translation.In both cases, the benchmark evaluates the ability of the model to encode emphasis in the speech input and accurately reproduce it in the output, potentially across a change of speaker and language.As part of the evaluation pipeline, we introduce EmphaClass, a new model that classifies emphasis at the frame or word level.
Maureen de Seyssel, Antony D'Avirro, Adina Williams, Emmanuel Dupoux
EMNLP1
2023 ProsAudit, a prosodic benchmark for self-supervised speech models
abstract
ISSN: 2958-1796
Maureen de Seyssel, Marvin Lavechin, Hadrien Titeux, Arthur Thomas, Gwendal Virlet, Andrea Santos Revilla, Guillaume Wisniewski, Bogdan Ludusan, Emmanuel Dupoux
INTERSPEECH1
2022 Is the Language Familiarity Effect gradual ? A computational modelling approach
Maureen de Seyssel, Guillaume Wisniewski, Emmanuel Dupoux
CogSci1
2022 Probing phoneme, language and speaker information in unsupervised speech representations
abstract
International audience
Maureen de Seyssel, Marvin Lavechin, Yossi Adi, Emmanuel Dupoux, Guillaume Wisniewski
INTERSPEECH1
2021 The Zero Resource Speech Challenge 2021: Spoken Language Modelling
abstract
We present the Zero Resource Speech Challenge 2021, which asks participants to learn a language model directly from audio, without any text or labels. The challenge is based on the Libri-light dataset, which provides up to 60k hours of audio from English audio books without any associated text. We provide a pipeline baseline system consisting on an encoder based on contrastive predictive coding (CPC), a quantizer ($k$-means) and a standard language model (BERT or LSTM). The metrics evaluate the learned representations at the acoustic (ABX discrimination), lexical (spot-the-word), syntactic (acceptability judgment) and semantic levels (similarity judgment). We present an overview of the eight submitted systems from four groups and discuss the main results.
Ewan Dunbar, Mathieu Bernard, Nicolas Hamilakis, Tu Anh Nguyen, Maureen de Seyssel, Patricia Rozé, Morgane Rivière, Eugene Kharitonov, Emmanuel Dupoux
Interspeech5
2020 Does bilingual input hurt? A simulation of language discrimination and clustering using i-vectors
Maureen de Seyssel, Emmanuel Dupoux
CogSci1