Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Weichan Zhong

dblp:245/3476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.412019
Semi-Supervised Feature Selection with Adaptive Discriminant Analysis · AAAI 2019
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.412019
Semi-Supervised Feature Selection with Adaptive Discriminant Analysis · AAAI 2019
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection › weakly supervised feature selection
semi-supervised feature selection
0.412019
Semi-Supervised Feature Selection with Adaptive Discriminant Analysis · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative optimization · 0.4adaptive similarity matrix · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Adaptive discriminant analysis for semi-supervised feature selection
Weichan Zhong, Xiaojun Chen 0006, Feiping Nie 0001, Joshua Zhexue Huang
Inf. Sci.1
2021 Selection of diverse features with a diverse regularization
Weichan Zhong, Xiaojun Chen 0006, Qingyao Wu, Min Yang 0007, Joshua Zhexue Huang
Pattern Recognit.1
2020 Deep Superpixel Cut for Unsupervised Image Segmentation
abstract
Image segmentation, one of the most critical vision tasks, has been studied for many years. Most of the early algorithms are unsupervised methods, which use hand-crafted features to divide the image into many regions. Recently, owing to the great success of deep learning technology, CNNs based methods show superior performance in image segmentation. However, these methods rely on a large number of human annotations, which are expensive to collect. In this paper, we propose a deep unsupervised method for image segmentation, which contains the following two stages. First, a Superpixelwise Autoencoder (SuperAE) is designed to learn the deep embedding and reconstruct a smoothed image, then the smoothed image is passed to generate superpixels. Second, we present a novel clustering algorithm called Deep Superpixel Cut (DSC), which measures the deep similarity between superpixels and formulates image segmentation as a soft partitioning problem. Via backpropagation, DSC adaptively partitions the superpixels into perceptual regions. Experimental results on the BSDS500 dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Qinghong Lin, Weichan Zhong, Jianglin Lu
ICPR2
2019 Semi-Supervised Feature Selection with Adaptive Discriminant Analysis
abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel Adaptive Discriminant Analysis for semi-supervised feature selection, namely SADA. Instead of computing fixed similarities before performing feature selection, SADA simultaneously learns an adaptive similarity matrix S and a projection matrix W with an iterative method. In each iteration, S is computed from the projected distance with the learned W and W is computed with the learned S. Therefore, SADA can learn better projection matrix W by weakening the effect of noise features with the adaptive similarity matrix. Experimental results on 4 data sets show the superiority of SADA compared to 5 semisupervised feature selection methods.
Weichan Zhong, Xiaojun Chen 0006, Guowen Yuan, Yiqin Li, Feiping Nie 0001
AAAI1