VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Susobhan Ghosh
dblp:245/3484
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 41% Multi-agent systems · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Energy systems and smart grids · 54% Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 19% Computational social science and digital humanities · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 77% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 23% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy systems and smart grids
energy trading |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020 VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019 |
Energy systems and smart grids › electricity market
smart grid markets |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020 VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
mixed-effects model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ReBandit: Random Effects Based Online RL Algorithm for Reducing Cannabis Use · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
online reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ReBandit: Random Effects Based Online RL Algorithm for Reducing Cannabis Use · IJCAI 2024 |
Electronic design automation
design space exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ArchGym: An Open-Source Gymnasium for Machine Learning Assisted Architecture Design · ISCA 2023 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation
demand prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Using Public Data to Predict Demand for Mobile Health Clinics · AAAI 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
socio-technical systems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Facilitating Human-Wildlife Cohabitation through Conflict Prediction · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
bidding strategy |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
autonomous agents |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › trading agents
broker agents |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.2 | 2 | 2020 | Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020 VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN accelerator |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | ArchGym: An Open-Source Gymnasium for Machine Learning Assisted Architecture Design · ISCA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 2.3random effects model · 1.5feature engineering from public data · 1.1AI-based prediction · 1.1markov decision process · 0.9equilibrium analysis · 0.9neural network · 0.8heuristic search · 0.8dynamic programming · 0.8proxy cost model · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ReBandit: Random Effects Based Online RL Algorithm for Reducing Cannabis Use
Susobhan Ghosh, Yongyi Guo, Pei-Yao Hung, Lara N. Coughlin, Erin E. Bonar, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Maureen A. Walton, Susan A. Murphy |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Did we personalize? Assessing personalization by an online reinforcement learning algorithm using resampling
Susobhan Ghosh, Raphael Kim, Prasidh Chhabria, Raaz Dwivedi, Predrag V. Klasnja, Kelly W. Zhang, Susan A. Murphy |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2023 | ArchGym: An Open-Source Gymnasium for Machine Learning Assisted Architecture DesignabstractMachine learning (ML) has become a prevalent approach to tame the complexity of design space exploration for domain-specific architectures. While appealing, using ML for design space exploration poses several challenges. First, it is not straightforward to identify the most suitable algorithm from an ever-increasing pool of ML methods. Second, assessing the trade-offs between performance and sample efficiency across these methods is inconclusive. Finally, the lack of a holistic framework for fair, reproducible, and objective comparison across these methods hinders the progress of adopting ML-aided architecture design space exploration and impedes creating repeatable artifacts. To mitigate these challenges, we introduce ArchGym, an open-source gymnasium and easy-to-extend framework that connects a diverse range of search algorithms to architecture simulators. To demonstrate its utility, we evaluate ArchGym across multiple vanilla and domain-specific search algorithms in the design of a custom memory controller, deep neural network accelerators, and a custom SoC for AR/VR workloads, collectively encompassing over 21K experiments. The results suggest that with an unlimited number of samples, ML algorithms are equally favorable to meet the user-defined target specification if its hyperparameters are tuned thoroughly; no one solution is necessarily better than another (e.g., reinforcement learning vs. Bayesian methods). We coin the term "hyperparameter lottery" to describe the relatively probable chance for a search algorithm to find an optimal design provided meticulously selected hyperparameters. Additionally, the ease of data collection and aggregation in ArchGym facilitates research in ML-aided architecture design space exploration. As a case study, we show this advantage by developing a proxy cost model with an RMSE of 0.61% that offers a 2,000-fold reduction in simulation time. Code and data for ArchGym is available at https://bit.ly/ArchGym. Srivatsan Krishnan, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Shvetank Prakash, Jason Jabbour, Ikechukwu Uchendu, Susobhan Ghosh, Behzad Boroujerdian, Daniel Richins, Devashree Tripathy, Aleksandra Faust, Vijay Janapa Reddi |
ISCA | 6 |
| 2022 | Using Public Data to Predict Demand for Mobile Health ClinicsabstractImproving health equity is an urgent task for our society. The advent of mobile clinics plays an important role in enhancing health equity, as they can provide easier access to preventive healthcare for patients from disadvantaged populations. For effective functioning of mobile clinics, accurate prediction of demand (expected number of individuals visiting mobile clinic) is the key to their daily operations and staff/resource allocation. Despite its importance, there have been very limited studies on predicting demand of mobile clinics. To the best of our knowledge, we are among the first to explore this area, using AI-based techniques. A crucial challenge in this task is that there are no known existing data sources from which we can extract useful information to account for the exogenous factors that may affect the demand, while considering protection of client privacy. We propose a novel methodology that completely uses public data sources to extract the features, with several new components that are designed to improve the prediction. Empirical evaluation on a real-world dataset from the mobile clinic The Family Van shows that, by leveraging publicly available data (which introduces no extra monetary cost to the mobile clinics), our AI-based method achieves 26.4% - 51.8% lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) than the historical average-based estimation (which is presently employed by mobile clinics like The Family Van). Our algorithm makes it possible for mobile clinics to plan proactively, rather than reactively, as what has been doing. Haipeng Chen 0001, Susobhan Ghosh, Gregory Fan, Nikhil Behari, Arpita Biswas, Mollie Williams, Nancy E. Oriol, Milind Tambe |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Facilitating Human-Wildlife Cohabitation through Conflict PredictionabstractWith increasing world population and expanded use of forests as cohabited regions, interactions and conflicts with wildlife are increasing, leading to large scale loss of lives (animal and human) and livelihoods (economic). While community knowledge is valuable, forest officials and conservation organisations can greatly benefit from predictive analysis of human-wildlife conflict, leading to targeted interventions that can potentially help save lives and livelihoods. However, the problem of prediction is a complex socio-technical problem in the context of limited data in low-resource regions. Identifying the right features to make accurate predictions of conflicts at the required spatial granularity using a sparse conflict training dataset is the key challenge that we address in this paper. Specifically, we do an illustrative case study on human-wildlife conflicts in the Bramhapuri Forest Division in Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India. Most existing work has considered human wildlife conflicts in protected areas and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort at prediction of human-wildlife conflicts in unprotected areas and using those predictions for deploying interventions on the ground. Susobhan Ghosh, Pradeep Varakantham, Aniket Bhatkhande, Tamanna Ahmad, Anish Andheria, Aparna Taneja, Divy Thakkar, Milind Tambe |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and StrategyabstractPeriodic Double Auctions (PDAs) are commonly used in the real world for trading, e.g. in stock markets to determine stock opening prices, and energy markets to trade energy in order to balance net demand in smart grids, involving trillions of dollars in the process. A bidder, participating in such PDAs, has to plan for bids in the current auction as well as for the future auctions, which highlights the necessity of good bidding strategies. In this paper, we perform an equilibrium analysis of single unit single-shot double auctions with a certain clearing price and payment rule, which we refer to as ACPR, and find it intractable to analyze as number of participating agents increase. We further derive the best response for a bidder with complete information in a single-shot double auction with ACPR. Leveraging the theory developed for single-shot double auction and taking the PowerTAC wholesale market PDA as our testbed, we proceed by modeling the PDA of PowerTAC as an MDP. We propose a novel bidding strategy, namely MDPLCPBS. We empirically show that MDPLCPBS follows the equilibrium strategy for double auctions that we previously analyze. In addition, we benchmark our strategy against the baseline and the state-of-the-art bidding strategies for the PowerTAC wholesale market PDAs, and show that MDPLCPBS outperforms most of them consistently. Susobhan Ghosh, Sujit Gujar, Praveen Paruchuri, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading CompetitionabstractA smart grid is an efficient and sustainable energy system that integrates diverse generation entities, distributed storage capacity, and smart appliances and buildings. A smart grid brings new kinds of participants in the energy market served by it, whose effect on the grid can only be determined through high fidelity simulations. Power TAC offers one such simulation platform using real-world weather data and complex state-of-the-art customer models. In Power TAC, autonomous energy brokers compete to make profits across tariff, wholesale and balancing markets while maintaining the stability of the grid. In this paper, we design an autonomous broker VidyutVanika, the runner-up in the 2018 Power TAC competition. VidyutVanika relies on reinforcement learning (RL) in the tariff market and dynamic programming in the wholesale market to solve modified versions of known Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulations in the respective markets. The novelty lies in defining the reward functions for MDPs, solving these MDPs, and the application of these solutions to real actions in the market. Unlike previous participating agents, VidyutVanika uses a neural network to predict the energy consumption of various customers using weather data. We use several heuristic ideas to bridge the gap between the restricted action spaces of the MDPs and the much more extensive action space available to VidyutVanika. These heuristics allow VidyutVanika to convert near-optimal fixed tariffs to time-of-use tariffs aimed at mitigating transmission capacity fees, spread out its orders across several auctions in the wholesale market to procure energy at a lower price, more accurately estimate parameters required for implementing the MDP solution in the wholesale market, and account for wholesale procurement costs while optimizing tariffs. We use Power TAC 2018 tournament data and controlled experiments to analyze the performance of VidyutVanika, and illustrate the efficacy of the above strategies. Susobhan Ghosh, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat, Sujit Gujar, Praveen Paruchuri |
AAAI | 1 |