Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yeliang Xiu

dblp:245/4789 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.912025
MultiLogicNMR(er): A Benchmark and Neural-Symbolic Framework for Non-monotonic Reasoning with Multiple Extensions · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
nonmonotonic reasoning
0.912025
MultiLogicNMR(er): A Benchmark and Neural-Symbolic Framework for Non-monotonic Reasoning with Multiple Extensions · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompting · 0.9neural-symbolic framework · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MultiLogicNMR(er): A Benchmark and Neural-Symbolic Framework for Non-monotonic Reasoning with Multiple Extensions
abstract
Non-monotonic reasoning (NMR) refers to the fact that conclusions may be invalidated by new information.It is widely used in daily life and legal reasoning.An NMR task usually has multiple extensions, which are sets of plausible conclusions.There are two reasoning modesskeptical and credulous reasoning, depending on whether to believe facts in all extensions or any one extension.Despite some preliminary work exploring the NMR abilities of LLMs, the multi-extension NMR capabilities of LLMs remain underexplored.In this paper, we synthesize a multi-extension NMR dataset Multi-LogicNMR, and construct two variants of the dataset with more extensions or text diversity.We propose a neural-symbolic framework Mul-tiLogicNMRer for multi-extension NMR.Experimental evaluation with the datasets shows that LLMs still face significant challenges in NMR abilities, and reveal the effectiveness of our neural-symbolic framework, with an average accuracy gain of about 15% compared to prompt-based methods, and even outperforming some fine-tuning methods.All code and data are publicly available 1 .
Yeliang Xiu, Yongmei Liu 0001
EMNLP1
2020 Influence Maximization Based Active Learning in Noisy Setting
Yeliang Xiu
ADMA1
2020 Discernibility matrix based incremental feature selection on fused decision tables
Lidi Zheng, Yeliang Xiu, Suyun Zhao, Xizhao Wang, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001
Int. J. Approx. Reason.3