Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaked Brody
dblp:245/4818
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 62% Graph learning · 38% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 60% Software maintenance and evolution · 32% Program analysis · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Program analysis
program representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
encoder-decoder neural network · 0.8abstract syntax tree path encoding · 0.8graph attention · 0.6expressiveness analysis · 0.6transformer · 0.4neural model · 0.4neural CRF · 0.4LSTM · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | FuseCap: Leveraging Large Language Models for Enriched Fused Image CaptionsabstractThe advent of vision-language pre-training techniques enhanced substantial progress in the development of models for image captioning. However, these models frequently produce generic captions and may omit semantically important image details. This limitation can be traced back to the image-text datasets; while their captions typically offer a general description of image content, they frequently omit salient details. Considering the magnitude of these datasets, manual reannotation is impractical, emphasizing the need for an automated approach. To address this challenge, we leverage existing captions and explore augmenting them with visual details using "frozen" vision experts including an object detector, an attribute recognizer, and an Optical Character Recognizer (OCR). Our proposed method, FuseCap, fuses the outputs of such vision experts with the original captions using a large language model (LLM), yielding comprehensive image descriptions. We automatically curate a training set of 12M image-enriched caption pairs. These pairs undergo extensive evaluation through both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Subsequently, this data is utilized to train a captioning generation BLIP-based model. This model outperforms current state-of-the-art approaches, producing more precise and detailed descriptions, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data-centric approach. We release this large-scale dataset of enriched image-caption pairs for the community. Noam Rotstein, David Bensaïd, Shaked Brody, Roy Ganz, Ron Kimmel |
WACV | 3 |
| 2022 | How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?
Shaked Brody, Uri Alon 0002, Eran Yahav |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | A structural model for contextual code changesabstractWe address the problem of predicting edit completions based on a learned model that was trained on past edits. Given a code snippet that is partially edited, our goal is to predict a completion of the edit for the rest of the snippet . We refer to this task as the EditCompletion task and present a novel approach for tackling it. The main idea is to directly represent structural edits. This allows us to model the likelihood of the edit itself, rather than learning the likelihood of the edited code. We represent an edit operation as a path in the program’s Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), originating from the source of the edit to the target of the edit. Using this representation, we present a powerful and lightweight neural model for the EditCompletion task. We conduct a thorough evaluation, comparing our approach to a variety of representation and modeling approaches that are driven by multiple strong models such as LSTMs, Transformers, and neural CRFs. Our experiments show that our model achieves a 28% relative gain over state-of-the-art sequential models and 2× higher accuracy than syntactic models that learn to generate the edited code , as opposed to modeling the edits directly. Our code, dataset, and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/tech-srl/c3po/ . Shaked Brody, Uri Alon 0002, Eran Yahav |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2019 | code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code
Uri Alon 0002, Shaked Brody, Omer Levy, Eran Yahav |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |