Machine learning methods have achieved great success in many software engineering tasks. However, as a data-driven paradigm, how would the data quality impact the effectiveness of these methods remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we explore this problem under the context of just-in-time obsolete comment detection. Specifically, we first conduct data cleaning on the existing benchmark dataset, and empirically observe that with only 0.22% label corrections and even 15.0% fewer data, the existing obsolete comment detection approaches can achieve up to 10.7% relative accuracy improvement. To further mitigate the data quality issues, we propose an adversarial learning framework to simultaneously estimate the data quality and make the final predictions. Experimental evaluations show that this adversarial learning framework can further improve the relative accuracy by up to 18.1% compared to the state-of-the-art method. Although our current results are from the obsolete comment detection problem, we believe that the proposed two-phase solution, which handles the data quality issues through both the data aspect and the algorithm aspect, is also generalizable and applicable to other machine learning based software engineering tasks.

API migration is an essential step for code migration between libraries or programming languages, and it is a challenging task as it requires detailed comprehension of both source and target APIs. The existing work either recommends mapped API names only and requires developers to select specific parameters and return value, or uses encoder-decoder models to directly “translate” the source API code into the target API code without considering the characteristics of APIs. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach that combines small API mapping models with Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, the small API mapping model is employed to embed API semantics through their usages and declarations, enabling accurate inference of API mappings across different libraries and programming languages. The inferred mappings are subsequently used as part of the prompts to guide LLMs to generate the target API code corresponding to the source API code. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in comparison to existing approaches w.r.t. both cross-library and cross-language API migration.

During software development, it is considered to be a best practice if each commit represents one distinct concern, such as fixing a bug or adding a new feature. However, developers may not always follow this practice and sometimes tangle multiple concerns into a single composite commit. This makes automatic commit untangling a necessary task, and recent approaches mainly untangle commits via applying graph clustering on the code dependency graph. In this paper, we propose a new commit untangling approach, ComUnt, to decompose the composite commits into atomic ones. Different from existing approaches, ComUnt is built upon the observation that both the textual content of code statements and the dependencies between code statements contain useful semantic information so as to better comprehend the committed code changes. Based on this observation, ComUnt first constructs an attributed graph for each commit, where code statements and various code dependencies are modeled as nodes and edges, respectively, and the textual body of code statements are maintained as node attributes. It then conducts attributed graph clustering on the constructed graph. The used attributed graph clustering algorithm can simultaneously encode both graph structure and node attributes so as to better separate the code changes into clusters with distinct concerns. We evaluate our approach on nine C# projects, and the experimental result shows that ComUnt improves the state-of-the-art by 7.8% in terms of untangling accuracy, and meanwhile it is more than 6 times faster.

Generating natural language messages for source code changes is an essential task in software development and maintenance. Existing solutions mainly treat a piece of code difference as natural language, and adopt seq2seq learning to translate it into a commit message. The basic assumption of such solutions lies in the naturalness hypothesis, i.e., source code written by programming languages is to some extent similar to natural language text. However, compared with natural language, source code also bears syntactic regularities. In this paper, we propose to simultaneously model the naturalness and syntactic regularities of source code changes for commit message generation. Specifically, to model syntactic regularities, we first enlarge the input with additional context information, i.e., the code statements that have dependency with the variables in the code difference, and then extract the paths in the corresponding ASTs. Moreover, to better model code difference, we align the two versions of code before and after the committed code change at token level, and annotate their differences with fine-grained edit operations. The context and difference are simultaneously encoded in a learning framework to generate the commit messages. We collected from GitHub a large dataset containing 480 Java projects with over 160k commits, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Commit messages, which summarize the source code changes in natural language, are essential for program comprehension and software evolution understanding. Unfortunately, due to the lack of direct motivation, commit messages are sometimes neglected by developers, making it necessary to automatically generate such messages. State-of-the-art adopts learning based approaches such as neural machine translation models for the commit message generation problem. However, they tend to ignore the code structure information and suffer from the out-of-vocabulary issue. In this paper, we propose CoDiSum to address the above two limitations. In particular, we first extract both code structure and code semantics from the source code changes, and then jointly model these two sources of information so as to better learn the representations of the code changes. Moreover, we augment the model with copying mechanism to further mitigate the out-of-vocabulary issue. Experimental evaluations on real data demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of accurately generating the commit messages.