Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christina Dan Wang

dblp:246/4851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Reinforcement learning · 35% Learning theory · 24%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 87% Information theory · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › conditional independence
conditional independence testing
0.712023
K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization
conditional independence testing
0.712023
Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · AAAI 2023
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.712023
Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment
benchmark environments
0.612022
FinRL-Meta: Market Environments and Benchmarks for Data-Driven Financial Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.212023
K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
type-i error control
0.212023
K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep reinforcement learning · 1.1dataops · 1.1nearest-neighbor sampling · 0.7k-nearest neighbors · 0.7conditional mutual information · 0.7classifier-based estimation · 0.7classifier-based conditional mutual information estimation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Dynamic datasets and market environments for financial reinforcement learning
Xiao-Yang Liu, Ziyi Xia, Hongyang Yang, Jiechao Gao, Daochen Zha, Ming Zhu 0002, Christina Dan Wang, Zhaoran Wang 0001
Mach. Learn.7
2023 Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing
abstract
The conditional randomization test (CRT) was recently proposed to test whether two random variables X and Y are conditionally independent given random variables Z. The CRT assumes that the conditional distribution of X given Z is known under the null hypothesis and then it is compared to the distribution of the observed samples of the original data. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel alternative of CRT by using nearest-neighbor sampling without assuming the exact form of the distribution of X given Z. Specifically, we utilize the computationally efficient 1-nearest-neighbor to approximate the conditional distribution that encodes the null hypothesis. Then, theoretically, we show that the distribution of the generated samples is very close to the true conditional distribution in terms of total variation distance. Furthermore, we take the classifier-based conditional mutual information estimator as our test statistic. The test statistic as an empirical fundamental information theoretic quantity is able to well capture the conditional-dependence feature. We show that our proposed test is computationally very fast, while controlling type I and II errors quite well. Finally, we demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed test in both synthetic and real data analyses.
Shuai Li 0020, Ziqi Chen 0002, Hongtu Zhu, Christina Dan Wang, Wang Wen
AAAI4
2023 K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing
abstract
Conditional independence (CI) testing is a fundamental task in statistics and machine learning, but its effectiveness is hindered by the challenges posed by high-dimensional conditioning variables and limited data samples. This article introduces a novel testing approach to address these challenges and enhance control of the type I error while achieving high power under alternative hypotheses. The proposed approach incorporates a computationally efficient classifier-based conditional mutual information (CMI) estimator, capable of capturing intricate dependence structures among variables. To approximate a distribution encoding the null hypothesis, a $k$-nearest-neighbor local sampling strategy is employed. An important advantage of this approach is its ability to operate without assumptions about distribution forms or feature dependencies. Furthermore, it eliminates the need to derive asymptotic null distributions for the estimated CMI and avoids dataset splitting, making it particularly suitable for small datasets. The method presented in this article demonstrates asymptotic control of the type I error and consistency against all alternative hypotheses. Extensive analyses using both synthetic and real data highlight the computational efficiency of the proposed test. Moreover, it outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of type I and II errors, even in scenarios with high-dimensional conditioning sets. Additionally, the proposed approach exhibits robustness in the presence of heavy-tailed data.
Shuai Li 0020, Yingjie Zhang 0004, Hongtu Zhu, Christina Dan Wang, Hai Shu, Ziqi Chen 0002
NeurIPS4
2022 FinRL-Meta: Market Environments and Benchmarks for Data-Driven Financial Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Finance is a particularly challenging playground for deep reinforcement learning. However, establishing high-quality market environments and benchmarks for financial reinforcement learning is challenging due to three major factors, namely, low signal-to-noise ratio of financial data, survivorship bias of historical data, and backtesting overfitting. In this paper, we present an openly accessible FinRL-Meta library that has been actively maintained by the AI4Finance community. First, following a DataOps paradigm, we will provide hundreds of market environments through an automatic data curation pipeline that processes dynamic datasets from real-world markets into gym-style market environments. Second, we reproduce popular papers as stepping stones for users to design new trading strategies. We also deploy the library on cloud platforms so that users can visualize their own results and assess the relative performance via community-wise competitions. Third, FinRL-Meta provides tens of Jupyter/Python demos organized into a curriculum and a documentation website to serve the rapidly growing community. FinRL-Meta is available at: \url{https://github.com/AI4Finance-Foundation/FinRL-Meta}
Xiao-Yang Liu, Ziyi Xia, Jingyang Rui, Jiechao Gao, Hongyang Yang, Ming Zhu 0002, Christina Dan Wang, Zhaoran Wang 0001
NeurIPS7