Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Weissmann
dblp:246/5069
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 62% Reinforcement learning · 38% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 91% Algorithms and data structures · 9% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Controlling the Flow: Stability and Convergence for Stochastic Gradient Descent with Decaying Regularization · NeurIPS 2025 Beyond Stationarity: Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Softmax Policy Gradient Methods · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controlling the Flow: Stability and Convergence for Stochastic Gradient Descent with Decaying Regularization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Stationarity: Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Softmax Policy Gradient Methods · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
inverse problems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
multilevel optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Stationarity: Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Softmax Policy Gradient Methods · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic softmax policy gradient · 1.5dynamic programming · 1.5tikhonov regularization · 0.9decaying regularization · 0.9multilevel optimization theory · 0.6langevin sampling · 0.6ensemble kalman inversion · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Controlling the Flow: Stability and Convergence for Stochastic Gradient Descent with Decaying RegularizationabstractThe present article studies the minimization of convex, $L$-smooth functions defined on a separable real Hilbert space. We analyze regularized stochastic gradient descent (reg-SGD), a variant of stochastic gradient descent that uses a Tikhonov regularization with time-dependent, vanishing regularization parameter. We prove strong convergence of reg-SGD to the minimum-norm solution of the original problem without additional boundedness assumptions. Moreover, we quantify the rate of convergence and optimize the interplay between step-sizes and regularization decay. Our analysis reveals how vanishing Tikhonov regularization controls the flow of SGD and yields stable learning dynamics, offering new insights into the design of iterative algorithms for convex problems, including those that arise in ill-posed inverse problems. We validate our theoretical findings through numerical experiments on image reconstruction and ODE-based inverse problems. Sebastian Kassing, Simon Weissmann, Leif Döring |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Structure Matters: Dynamic Policy GradientabstractIn this work, we study $\gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) and introduce a framework called dynamic policy gradient (DynPG). The framework directly integrates dynamic programming with (any) policy gradient method, explicitly leveraging the Markovian property of the environment. DynPG dynamically adjusts the problem horizon during training, decomposing the original infinite-horizon MDP into a sequence of contextual bandit problems. By iteratively solving these contextual bandits, DynPG converges to the stationary optimal policy of the infinite-horizon MDP. To demonstrate the power of DynPG, we establish its non-asymptotic global convergence rate under the tabular softmax parametrization, focusing on the dependencies on salient but essential parameters of the MDP. By combining classical arguments from dynamic programming with more recent convergence arguments of policy gradient schemes, we prove that softmax DynPG scales polynomially in the effective horizon $(1-\gamma)^{-1}$. Our findings contrast recent exponential lower bound examples for vanilla policy gradient. Sara Klein, Xiangyuan Zhang, Tamer Basar, Simon Weissmann, Leif Döring |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Beyond Stationarity: Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Softmax Policy Gradient MethodsabstractMarkov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a formal framework for modeling and solving sequential decision-making problems. In finite time horizons such problems are relevant for instance for optimal stopping or specific supply chain problems, but also in the training of large language models. In contrast to infinite horizon MDPs optimal policies are not stationary, policies must be learned for every single epoch. In practice all parameters are often trained simultaneously, ignoring the inherent structure suggested by dynamic programming. This paper introduces a combination of dynamic programming and policy gradient called dynamical policy gradient, where the parameters are trained backwards in time.
For the tabular softmax parametrisation we carry out the convergence analysis for simultaneous and dynamic policy gradient towards global optima, both in the exact and sampled gradient settings without regularisation. It turns out that the use of dynamic policy gradient training much better exploits the structure of finite-time problems which is reflected in improved convergence bounds. Sara Klein, Simon Weissmann, Leif Döring |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse ProblemsabstractInverse problems occur in a variety of parameter identification tasks in engineering. Such problems are challenging in practice, as they require repeated evaluation of computationally expensive forward models. We introduce a unifying framework of multilevel optimization that can be applied to a wide range of optimization-based solvers. Our framework provably reduces the computational cost associated with evaluating the expensive forward maps stemming from various physical models. To demonstrate the versatility of our analysis, we discuss its implications for various methodologies including multilevel (accelerated, stochastic) gradient descent, a multilevel ensemble Kalman inversion and a multilevel Langevin sampler. We also provide numerical experiments to verify our theoretical findings. Simon Weissmann, Ashia Wilson, Jakob Zech |
COLT | 1 |