Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Heek

dblp:247/1004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Generative modeling · 43% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 19%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 50% Image and video processing · 50%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
3.042025
Simpler Diffusion: 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 with Pixel-space Diffusion · CVPR 2025
Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Rolling Diffusion Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
1.322023
Patch n' Pack: NaViT, a Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and Resolution · NeurIPS 2023
Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distillation
0.812024
Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
moment matching
0.812024
Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model acceleration
sampling acceleration
0.812024
Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video prediction
0.812024
Rolling Diffusion Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
high-resolution image synthesis
0.712023
simple diffusion: End-to-end diffusion for high resolution images · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training
0.712023
Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › vision transformer
vision transformer scaling
0.712023
Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › partial differential equation based denoising
diffusion-based denoising
0.712023
simple diffusion: End-to-end diffusion for high resolution images · ICML 2023
Visual content generation and editing
image generation
0.712023
simple diffusion: End-to-end diffusion for high resolution images · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.212024
Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness trade-off
fairness-accuracy trade-off
0.212023
Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness and robustness
0.212023
Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noise schedule adjustment · 1.3dropout · 1.3downsampling · 1.3sigmoid loss-weighting · 0.9guidance intervals · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9multi-step distillation · 0.8conditional expectation matching · 0.8linear probing on frozen features · 0.7large-scale pretraining · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Simpler Diffusion: 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 with Pixel-space Diffusion
abstract
Latent diffusion models have become the popular choice for scaling up diffusion models for high resolution image synthesis. Compared to pixel-space models that are trained end-to-end, latent models are perceived to be more efficient and to produce higher image quality at high resolution. Here we challenge these notions, and show that pixel-space models can be very competitive to latent models both in quality and efficiency, achieving 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 and new SOTA results on ImageNet128, ImageNet256 and Kinetics600.We present a simple recipe for scaling end-to-end pixel-space diffusion models to high resolutions. 1: Use the sigmoid loss-weighting [25] with our prescribed hyper-parameters. 2: Use our simplified memory-efficient architecture with fewer skip-connections. 3: Scale the model to favor processing the image at a high resolution with fewer parameters, rather than using more parameters at a lower resolution. Combining these with guidance intervals, we obtain a family of pixel-space diffusion models we call Simpler Diffusion (SiD2).
Emiel Hoogeboom, Thomas Mensink, Jonathan Heek, Kay Lamerigts, Ruiqi Gao, Tim Salimans
CVPR3
2024 Rolling Diffusion Models
abstract
Diffusion models have recently been increasingly applied to temporal data such as video, fluid mechanics simulations, or climate data. These methods generally treat subsequent frames equally regarding the amount of noise in the diffusion process. This paper explores Rolling Diffusion: a new approach that uses a sliding window denoising process. It ensures that the diffusion process progressively corrupts through time by assigning more noise to frames that appear later in a sequence, reflecting greater uncertainty about the future as the generation process unfolds. Empirically, we show that when the temporal dynamics are complex, Rolling Diffusion is superior to standard diffusion. In particular, this result is demonstrated in a video prediction task using the Kinetics-600 video dataset and in a chaotic fluid dynamics forecasting experiment.
David Ruhe, Jonathan Heek, Tim Salimans, Emiel Hoogeboom
ICML2
2024 Multistep Distillation of Diffusion Models via Moment Matching
abstract
We present a new method for making diffusion models faster to sample. The method distills many-step diffusion models into few-step models by matching conditional expectations of the clean data given noisy data along the sampling trajectory. Our approach extends recently proposed one-step methods to the multi-step case, and provides a new perspective by interpreting these approaches in terms of moment matching. By using up to 8 sampling steps, we obtain distilled models that outperform not only their one-step versions but also their original many-step teacher models, obtaining new state-of-the-art results on the Imagenet dataset. We also show promising results on a large text-to-image model where we achieve fast generation of high resolution images directly in image space, without needing autoencoders or upsamplers.
Tim Salimans, Thomas Mensink, Jonathan Heek, Emiel Hoogeboom
NeurIPS3
2023 Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters
abstract
The scaling of Transformers has driven breakthrough capabilities for language models. At present, the largest large language models (LLMs) contain upwards of 100B parameters. Vision Transformers (ViT) have introduced the same architecture to image and video modelling, but these have not yet been successfully scaled to nearly the same degree; the largest dense ViT contains 4B parameters (Chen et al., 2022). We present a recipe for highly efficient and stable training of a 22B-parameter ViT (ViT-22B) and perform a wide variety of experiments on the resulting model. When evaluated on downstream tasks (often with a lightweight linear model on frozen features), ViT-22B demonstrates increasing performance with scale. We further observe other interesting benefits of scale, including an improved tradeoff between fairness and performance, state-of-the-art alignment to human visual perception in terms of shape/texture bias, and improved robustness. ViT-22B demonstrates the potential for "LLM-like" scaling in vision, and provides key steps towards getting there.
Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski, Jonathan Heek, Justin Gilmer, Andreas Steiner 0001, Mathilde Caron, Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Rodolphe Jenatton, Lucas Beyer, Michael Tschannen, Anurag Arnab, Xiao Wang 0038, Carlos Riquelme, Matthias Minderer, Joan Puigcerver, Utku Evci, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Gamaleldin F. Elsayed, Aravindh Mahendran, Fisher Yu 0001, Avital Oliver, Fantine Huot, Jasmijn Bastings, Mark Collier, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Vighnesh Birodkar, Cristina Nader Vasconcelos, Yi Tay, Thomas Mensink, Alexander Kolesnikov 0003, Filip Pavetic, Dustin Tran, Thomas Kipf, Mario Lucic, Xiaohua Zhai, Daniel Keysers, Jeremiah J. Harmsen, Neil Houlsby
ICML5
2023 simple diffusion: End-to-end diffusion for high resolution images
abstract
Currently, applying diffusion models in pixel space of high resolution images is difficult. Instead, existing approaches focus on diffusion in lower dimensional spaces (latent diffusion), or have multiple super-resolution levels of generation referred to as cascades. The downside is that these approaches add additional complexity to the diffusion framework. This paper aims to improve denoising diffusion for high resolution images while keeping the model as simple as possible. The paper is centered around the research question: How can one train a standard denoising diffusion models on high resolution images, and still obtain performance comparable to these alternate approaches? The four main findings are: 1) the noise schedule should be adjusted for high resolution images, 2) It is sufficient to scale only a particular part of the architecture, 3) dropout should be added at specific locations in the architecture, and 4) downsampling is an effective strategy to avoid high resolution feature maps. Combining these simple yet effective techniques, we achieve state-of-the-art on image generation among diffusion models without sampling modifiers on ImageNet.
Emiel Hoogeboom, Jonathan Heek, Tim Salimans
ICML2
2023 Patch n' Pack: NaViT, a Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and Resolution
abstract
The ubiquitous and demonstrably suboptimal choice of resizing images to a fixed resolution before processing them with computer vision models has not yet been successfully challenged. However, models such as the Vision Transformer (ViT) offer flexible sequence-based modeling, and hence varying input sequence lengths. We take advantage of this with NaViT (Native Resolution ViT) which uses sequence packing during training to process inputs of arbitrary resolutions and aspect ratios. Alongside flexible model usage, we demonstrate improved training efficiency for large-scale supervised and contrastive image-text pretraining. NaViT can be efficiently transferred to standard tasks such as image and video classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation and leads to improved results on robustness and fairness benchmarks. At inference time, the input resolution flexibility can be used to smoothly navigate the test-time cost-performance trade-off. We believe that NaViTmarks a departure from the standard, CNN-designed, input and modelling pipeline used by most computer vision models, and represents a promising direction for ViTs.
Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Basil Mustafa, Josip Djolonga, Jonathan Heek, Matthias Minderer, Mathilde Caron, Andreas Steiner 0001, Joan Puigcerver, Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Avital Oliver, Piotr Padlewski, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Mario Lucic, Neil Houlsby
NeurIPS4