Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kaylene C. Stocking

dblp:247/4099 · also Kaylene Caswell Stocking · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 91% Autonomous driving · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
constraint inference
0.612022
Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference on Continuous State Spaces · ICRA 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.612022
Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference on Continuous State Spaces · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction
0.212022
Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference on Continuous State Spaces · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo sampling · 0.6maximum entropy · 0.6deep reinforcement learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference on Continuous State Spaces
abstract
When a robot observes another agent unexpectedly modifying their behavior, inferring the most likely cause is a valuable tool for maintaining safety and reacting appropriately. In this work, we present a novel method for inferring constraints that works on continuous, possibly sub-optimal demonstrations. We first learn a representation of the continuous-state maximum entropy trajectory distribution using deep reinforcement learning. We then use Monte Carlo sampling from this distribution to generate expected constraint violation probabilities and perform constraint inference. When the demonstrator's dynamics and objective function are known in advance, this process can be performed offline, allowing for real-time constraint inference at the moment demonstrations are observed. We evaluate our approach on two continuous dynamical systems: a 2-dimensional inverted pendulum model, and a 4-dimensional unicycle model that was successfully used for fast constraint inference on a 1/10 scale car remote-controlled by a human.
Kaylene C. Stocking, David Livingston McPherson, Robert P. Matthew, Claire J. Tomlin
ICRA1