Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaume de Dios Pont
dblp:247/9371 · also Jaume de Dios 0001
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2921-960XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational complexity · 39% Mathematical optimization · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 19% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
log-concave sampling |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023 |
Computational complexity
query complexity |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023 |
Computational complexity › lower bounds
sampling lower bounds |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wishart matrix · 1.4block krylov algorithms · 1.4product distributions · 0.9biased fourier analysis · 0.9query lower bounds · 0.8reduction · 0.7multiscale construction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Predicting quantum channels over general product distributionsabstractWe investigate the problem of predicting the output behavior of unknown quantum channels. Given query access to an $n$-qubit channel $\mathcal{E}$ and an observable $\mathcal{O}$, we aim to learn the mapping \begin{equation*} \rho \mapsto \Tr(\mathcal{O} \mathcal{E}[\rho]) \end{equation*} to within a small error for most $\rho$ sampled from a distribution $\mathcal{D}$. Previously, Huang et al. proved a surprising result that even if $\mathcal{E}$ is arbitrary, this task can be solved in time roughly $n^{O(\log(1/\epsilon))}$, where $\epsilon$ is the target prediction error. However, their guarantee applied only to input distributions $\mathcal{D}$ invariant under all single-qubit Clifford gates, and their algorithm fails for important cases such as general product distributions over product states $\rho$. In this work, we propose a new approach that achieves accurate prediction over essentially any product distribution $\mathcal{D}$, provided it is not “classical” in which case there is a trivial exponential lower bound. Our method employs a “biased Pauli analysis,” analogous to classical biased Fourier analysis. Implementing this approach requires overcoming several challenges unique to the quantum setting, including the lack of a basis with appropriate orthogonality properties. The techniques we develop to address these issues may have broader applications in quantum information. Sitan Chen, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jane Lange, Jerry Li 0001 |
COLT | 2 |
| 2024 | Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave SamplingabstractLog-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving lower bounds for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension \(d\ge 2\) requires \(\Omega (\log \kappa)\) queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d ) requires \(\widetilde{\Omega }(\min (\sqrt \kappa \log d, d))\) queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here, \(\kappa\) denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature. Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan |
J. ACM | 2 |
| 2023 | Query lower bounds for log-concave samplingabstractLog-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving $\lt$bold$\gt$lower bounds$\lt$/bold$\gt$ for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension $d \geq 2$ requires $\Omega(\log \kappa)$ queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general logconcave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d) requires $\widetilde{\Omega}(\min (\sqrt{\kappa} \log d, d))$ queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here $\kappa$ denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature. Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan |
FOCS | 2 |