Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Whitney Newey

dblp:247/9578 · also Whitney K. Newey · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 78% Learning theory · 12% Trustworthy machine learning · 10%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
1.932023
Minimax Instrumental Variable Regression and L2 Convergence Guarantees without Identification or Closedness · COLT 2023
Inference on Strongly Identified Functionals of Weakly Identified Functions · COLT 2023
RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forests · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable regression
1.322023
Minimax Instrumental Variable Regression and L2 Convergence Guarantees without Identification or Closedness · COLT 2023
Inference on Strongly Identified Functionals of Weakly Identified Functions · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.712023
Minimax Instrumental Variable Regression and L2 Convergence Guarantees without Identification or Closedness · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
proximal causal inference
0.712023
Inference on Strongly Identified Functionals of Weakly Identified Functions · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
average treatment effect estimation
0.612022
RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forests · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
debiased machine learning
0.612022
RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forests · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

penalized estimation · 1.3minimax estimation · 1.3debiasing · 0.7constrained optimization · 0.7stochastic gradient descent · 0.6riesz representation · 0.6random forest · 0.6neural network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Inference on Strongly Identified Functionals of Weakly Identified Functions
abstract
In a variety of applications, including nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) analysis, proximal causal inference under unmeasured confounding, and missing-not-at-random data with shadow variables, we are interested in inference on a continuous linear functional (e.g., average causal effects) of nuisance function (e.g., NPIV regression) defined by conditional moment restrictions. These nuisance functions are generally weakly identified, in that the conditional moment restrictions can be severely ill-posed as well as admit multiple solutions. This is sometimes resolved by imposing strong conditions that imply the function can be estimated at rates that make inference on the functional possible. In this paper, we study a novel condition for the functional to be strongly identified even when the nuisance function is not; that is, the functional is amenable to asymptotically-normal estimation at root-n-rates. The condition implies the existence of debiasing nuisance functions, and we propose penalized minimax estimators for both the primary and debiasing nuisance functions. The proposed nuisance estimators can accommodate flexible function classes, and importantly they can converge to fixed limits determined by the penalization regardless of the identifiability of the nuisances. We use the penalized nuisance estimators to form a debiased estimator for the functional of interest and prove its asymptotic normality under generic high-level conditions, which provide for asymptotically valid confidence intervals. We also illustrate our method in a novel partially linear proximal causal inference problem and a partially linear instrumental variable regression problem.
Andrew Bennett, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, Whitney Newey, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Masatoshi Uehara
COLT4
2023 Minimax Instrumental Variable Regression and L2 Convergence Guarantees without Identification or Closedness
abstract
In this paper, we study nonparametric estimation of instrumental variable (IV) regressions. Recently, many flexible machine learning methods have been developed for instrumental variable estimation. However, these methods have at least one of the following limitations: (1) restricting the IV regression to be uniquely identified; (2) only obtaining estimation error rates in terms weak metrics (e.g., projected norm) rather than strong metrics (e.g., L_2 norm); or (3) imposing the so-called closedness condition that requires a certain conditional expectation operator to be sufficiently smooth. In this paper, we present the first method and analysis that can avoid all three limitations, while still permitting general function approximation. Specifically, we propose a new penalized minimax estimator that can converge to a fixed IV solution even when there are multiple solutions, and we derive a strong L_2 error rate for our estimator under lax conditions. Notably, this guarantee only needs a widely-used source condition and realizability assumptions, but not the so-called closedness condition. We argue that the source condition and the closedness condition are inherently conflicting, so relaxing the latter significantly improves upon the existing literature that requires both conditions. Our estimator can achieve this improvement because it builds on a novel formulation of the IV estimation problem as a constrained optimization problem.
Andrew Bennett, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, Whitney Newey, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Masatoshi Uehara
COLT4
2022 RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forests
abstract
Many causal and policy effects of interest are defined by linear functionals of high-dimensional or non-parametric regression functions. $\sqrt{n}$-consistent and asymptotically normal estimation of the object of interest requires debiasing to reduce the effects of regularization and/or model selection on the object of interest. Debiasing is typically achieved by adding a correction term to the plug-in estimator of the functional, which leads to properties such as semi-parametric efficiency, double robustness, and Neyman orthogonality. We implement an automatic debiasing procedure based on automatically learning the Riesz representation of the linear functional using Neural Nets and Random Forests. Our method only relies on black-box evaluation oracle access to the linear functional and does not require knowledge of its analytic form. We propose a multitasking Neural Net debiasing method with stochastic gradient descent minimization of a combined Riesz representer and regression loss, while sharing representation layers for the two functions. We also propose a Random Forest method which learns a locally linear representation of the Riesz function. Even though our method applies to arbitrary functionals, we experimentally find that it performs well compared to the state of art neural net based algorithm of Shi et al. (2019) for the case of the average treatment effect functional. We also evaluate our method on the problem of estimating average marginal effects with continuous treatments, using semi-synthetic data of gasoline price changes on gasoline demand.
Victor Chernozhukov, Whitney Newey, Victor Quintas-Martinez, Vasilis Syrgkanis
ICML2