Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Caine
dblp:248/2457
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
3D vision · 38% Autonomous driving · 26% Image recognition and object detection · 8% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
2.1 | 5 | 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernels · CVPR 2021 Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion Forecasting · ICRA 2024 Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents · ICLR 2022 Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | PseudoAugment: Learning to Use Unlabeled Data for Data Augmentation in Point Clouds · ECCV (31) 2022 Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
cross-modal feature alignment |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching
feature alignment |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multimodal perception
LiDAR-camera fusion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
multi-agent trajectory prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
multimodal 3d object detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PseudoAugment: Learning to Use Unlabeled Data for Data Augmentation in Point Clouds · ECCV (31) 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
interactive trajectory prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
2d object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
point cloud object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming Object Detection for 3-D Point Clouds · ECCV (18) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness evaluation
robustness benchmark |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion Forecasting · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object annotation
3d bounding box annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernels · CVPR 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data augmentation · 0.8causal agent labeling · 0.8transformer architecture · 0.6semi-supervised learning · 0.6pseudo-labeling · 0.6manual error categorization · 0.6learnable alignment · 0.6inverse augmentation · 0.6cross-attention · 0.6cross-modality fusion · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion ForecastingabstractAs machine learning models become increasingly prevalent in motion forecasting for autonomous vehicles (AVs), it is critical to ensure that model predictions are safe and reliable. In this paper, we examine the robustness of motion forecasting to non-causal perturbations. We construct a new benchmark for evaluating and improving model robustness by applying perturbations to existing data. Specifically, we conduct an extensive labeling effort to identify causal agents, or agents whose presence influences human drivers’ behavior, in the Waymo Open Motion Dataset (WOMD), and we use these labels to perturb the data by deleting non-causal agents from the scene. We evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art deep-learning models on our proposed benchmark and find that all evaluated models exhibit large shifts under non-causal perturbation: we observe a surprising 25-38% relative change in minADE as compared to the original. In addition, we investigate techniques to improve model robustness, including increasing the training dataset size and using targeted data augmentations that randomly drop non-causal agents throughout training. Finally, we release the causal agent labels as an extension to WOMD and the robustness benchmarks to aid the community in building more reliable and safe deep-learning models for motion forecasting1. Rebecca Roelofs, Benjamin Caine, Khaled S. Refaat, Benjamin Sapp, Scott Ettinger, Wei Chai |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2022 | DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object DetectionabstractLidars and cameras are critical sensors that provide complementary information for 3D detection in autonomous driving. While prevalent multi-modal methods [34], [36] simply decorate raw lidar point clouds with camera features and feed them directly to existing 3D detection models, our study shows that fusing camera features with deep lidar features instead of raw points, can lead to better performance. However, as those features are often augmented and aggregated, a key challenge in fusion is how to effectively align the transformed features from two modalities. In this paper, we propose two novel techniques: InverseAug that inverses geometric-related augmentations, e.g., rotation, to enable accurate geometric alignment between lidar points and image pixels, and LearnableAlign that leverages cross-attention to dynamically capture the correlations between image and lidar features during fusion. Based on InverseAug and LearnableAlign, we develop a family of generic multi-modal 3D detection models named DeepFusion, which is more accurate than previous methods. For example, DeepFusion improves Point-Pillars, CenterPoint, and 3D-MAN baselines on Pedestrian detection for 6.7,8.9, and 6.2 LEVEL_2 APH, respectively. Notably, our models achieve state-of-the-art performance on Waymo Open Dataset, and show strong model robustness against input corruptions and out-of-distribution data. Code will be publicly available at https://github.com/tensorflow/lingvo. Yingwei Li 0002, Adams Wei Yu, Tianjian Meng, Benjamin Caine, Jiquan Ngiam, Daiyi Peng, Junyang Shen, Yifeng Lu, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, Alan L. Yuille, Mingxing Tan |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2022 | PseudoAugment: Learning to Use Unlabeled Data for Data Augmentation in Point Clouds
Zhaoqi Leng, Shuyang Cheng, Benjamin Caine, Weiyue Wang 0002, Jonathon Shlens, Mingxing Tan, Dragomir Anguelov |
ECCV (31) | 3 |
| 2022 | Scene Transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents
Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Benjamin Caine, Hao-Tien Chiang, Jeffrey Ling, Rebecca Roelofs, Alex Bewley, Chenxi Liu 0001, Ashish Venugopal, David J. Weiss, Benjamin Sapp, Jonathon Shlens |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetabstractImage classification accuracy on the ImageNet dataset has been a barometer for progress in computer vision over the last decade. Several recent papers have questioned the degree to which the benchmark remains useful to the community, yet innovations continue to contribute gains to performance, with today's largest models achieving 90%+ top-1 accuracy. To help contextualize progress on ImageNet and provide a more meaningful evaluation for today's state-of-the-art models, we manually review and categorize every remaining mistake that a few top models make in order to provide insight into the long-tail of errors on one of the most benchmarked datasets in computer vision. We focus on the multi-label subset evaluation of ImageNet, where today's best models achieve upwards of 97% top-1 accuracy. Our analysis reveals that nearly half of the supposed mistakes are not mistakes at all, and we uncover new valid multi-labels, demonstrating that, without careful review, we are significantly underestimating the performance of these models. On the other hand, we also find that today's best models still make a significant number of mistakes (40%) that are obviously wrong to human reviewers. To calibrate future progress on ImageNet, we provide an updated multi-label evaluation set, and we curate ImageNet-Major: a 68-example "major error" slice of the obvious mistakes made by today's top models -- a slice where models should achieve near perfection, but today are far from doing so. Vijay Vasudevan, Benjamin Caine, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Rebecca Roelofs |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | To the Point: Efficient 3D Object Detection in the Range Image With Graph Convolution Kernelsabstract3D object detection is vital for many robotics applications. For tasks where a 2D perspective range image exists, we propose to learn a 3D representation directly from this range image view. To this end, we designed a 2D convolutional network architecture that carries the 3D spherical coordinates of each pixel throughout the network. Its layers can consume any arbitrary convolution kernel in place of the default inner product kernel and exploit the underlying local geometry around each pixel. We outline four such kernels: a dense kernel according to the bag-of-words paradigm, and three graph kernels inspired by recent graph neural network advances: the Transformer, the PointNet, and the Edge Convolution. We also explore cross-modality fusion with the camera image, facilitated by operating in the perspective range image view. Our method performs competitively on the Waymo Open Dataset and improves the state-of-the-art AP for pedestrian detection from 69.7% to 75.5%. It is also efficient in that our smallest model, which still outperforms the popular PointPillars in quality, requires 180 times fewer FLOPS and model parameters. Yuning Chai, Jiquan Ngiam, Weiyue Wang 0002, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Dragomir Anguelov |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2021 | Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion DatasetabstractAs autonomous driving systems mature, motion forecasting has received increasing attention as a critical requirement for planning. Of particular importance are interactive situations such as merges, unprotected turns, etc., where predicting individual object motion is not sufficient. Joint predictions of multiple objects are required for effective route planning. There has been a critical need for high-quality motion data that is rich in both interactions and annotation to develop motion planning models. In this work, we introduce the most diverse interactive motion dataset to our knowledge, and provide specific labels for interacting objects suitable for developing joint prediction models. With over 100,000 scenes, each 20 seconds long at 10 Hz, our new dataset contains more than 570 hours of unique data over 1750 km of roadways. It was collected by mining for interesting interactions between vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists across six cities within the United States. We use a high-accuracy 3D auto-labeling system to generate high quality 3D bounding boxes for each road agent, and provide corresponding high definition 3D maps for each scene. Furthermore, we introduce a new set of metrics that provides a comprehensive evaluation of both single agent and joint agent interaction motion forecasting models. Finally, we provide strong baseline models for individual-agent prediction and joint-prediction. We hope that this new large-scale interactive motion dataset will provide new opportunities for advancing motion forecasting models. Scott Ettinger, Shuyang Cheng, Benjamin Caine, Chenxi Liu 0001, Hang Zhao 0021, Sabeek Pradhan, Yuning Chai, Benjamin Sapp, Charles R. Qi, Zoey Yang, Aurelien Chouard, Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Alexander McCauley, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2020 | Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open DatasetabstractThe research community has increasing interest in autonomous driving research, despite the resource intensity of obtaining representative real world data. Existing self-driving datasets are limited in the scale and variation of the environments they capture, even though generalization within and between operating regions is crucial to the over-all viability of the technology. In an effort to help align the research community’s contributions with real-world self-driving problems, we introduce a new large scale, high quality, diverse dataset. Our new dataset consists of 1150 scenes that each span 20 seconds, consisting of well synchronized and calibrated high quality LiDAR and camera data captured across a range of urban and suburban geographies. It is 15x more diverse than the largest camera+LiDAR dataset available based on our proposed diversity metric. We exhaustively annotated this data with 2D (camera image) and 3D (LiDAR) bounding boxes, with consistent identifiers across frames. Finally, we provide strong baselines for 2D as well as 3D detection and tracking tasks. We further study the effects of dataset size and generalization across geographies on 3D detection methods. Find data, code and more up-to-date information at http://www.waymo.com/open. Henrik Kretzschmar, Xerxes Dotiwalla, Aurelien Chouard, Vijaysai Patnaik, Paul Tsui, James Guo, Yuning Chai, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Wei Han 0002, Jiquan Ngiam, Hang Zhao 0021, Aleksei Timofeev, Scott Ettinger, Maxim Krivokon, Amy Gao, Yu Zhang 0033, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
CVPR | 10 |
| 2020 | Improving 3D Object Detection Through Progressive Population Based Augmentation
Shuyang Cheng, Zhaoqi Leng, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Chunyan Bai, Jiquan Ngiam, Benjamin Caine, Vijay Vasudevan, Quoc V. Le, Jonathon Shlens, Dragomir Anguelov |
ECCV (21) | 8 |
| 2020 | Streaming Object Detection for 3-D Point Clouds
Wei Han 0002, Benjamin Caine, Brandon Yang, Christoph Sprunk, Ouais Alsharif, Jiquan Ngiam, Vijay Vasudevan, Jonathon Shlens |
ECCV (18) | 3 |