Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naibo Wang

dblp:248/2541 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5660-5250ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 47% Language models and text generation · 25% Reinforcement learning · 25%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.422024
One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity · ACM Multimedia 2024
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.912025
AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model
0.912025
AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
process supervision
0.912025
AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.912025
AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
sequential federated learning
0.812024
One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated learning systems
0.712023
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity
0.212024
One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.212024
One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
model diversity
0.212024
One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity · ACM Multimedia 2024
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.212023
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 1.3rejection sampling · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9local model pool · 0.8distance measurement · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision
abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated significant potential for addressing complex tasks through mechanisms such as chain-of-thought reasoning and tool invocation.However, current frameworks lack explicit supervision during the reasoning process, which may lead to error propagation across reasoning chains and hinder the optimization of intermediate decision-making stages.This paper introduces a novel framework, AgentPro, which enhances LLM agent performance by automated process supervision.AgentPro employs Monte Carlo Tree Search to automatically generate step-level annotations, and develops a process reward model based on these annotations to facilitate fine-grained quality assessment of reasoning.By employing a rejection sampling strategy, the LLM agent dynamically adjusts generation probability distributions to prevent the continuation of erroneous paths, thereby improving reasoning capabilities.Extensive experiments on four datasets indicate that our method significantly outperforms existing agent-based LLM methods (e.g., achieving a 6.32% increase in accuracy on the HotpotQA dataset), underscoring its proficiency in managing intricate reasoning chains.
Yuchen Deng, Shichen Fan, Naibo Wang, Xinkui Zhao, See-Kiong Ng
EMNLP3
2024 One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity
abstract
Traditional federated learning mainly focuses on parallel settings (PFL), which can suffer significant communication and computation costs. In contrast, one-shot and sequential federated learning (SFL) have emerged as innovative paradigms to alleviate these costs. However, the issue of non-IID (Independent and Identically Distributed) data persists as a significant challenge in one-shot and SFL settings, exacerbated by the restricted communication between clients. In this paper, we improve the one-shot sequential federated learning for non-IID data by proposing a local model diversity-enhancing strategy. Specifically, to leverage the potential of local model diversity for improving model performance, we introduce a local model pool for each client that comprises diverse models generated during local training, and propose two distance measurements to further enhance the model diversity and mitigate the effect of non-IID data. Consequently, our proposed framework can improve the global model performance while maintaining low communication costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method exhibits superior performance to existing one-shot PFL methods and achieves better accuracy compared with state-of-the-art one-shot SFL methods on both label-skew and domain-shift tasks (e.g., 6%+ accuracy improvement on the CIFAR-10 dataset). Our code and supplementary are available online: https://github.com/NaiboWang/FedELMY.
Naibo Wang, Yuchen Deng, Wenjie Feng 0001, Shichen Fan, Jianwei Yin, See-Kiong Ng
ACM Multimedia1
2023 A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection
abstract
As data privacy increasingly becomes a critical societal concern, federated learning has been a hot research topic in enabling the collaborative training of machine learning models among different organizations under the privacy restrictions. As researchers try to support more machine learning models with different privacy-preserving approaches, there is a requirement in developing systems and infrastructures to ease the development of various federated learning algorithms. Similar to deep learning systems such as PyTorch and TensorFlow that boost the development of deep learning, federated learning systems (FLSs) are equivalently important, and face challenges from various aspects such as effectiveness, efficiency, and privacy. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review on federated learning systems. To understand the key design system components and guide future research, we introduce the definition of federated learning systems and analyze the system components. Moreover, we provide a thorough categorization for federated learning systems according to six different aspects, including data distribution, machine learning model, privacy mechanism, communication architecture, scale of federation and motivation of federation. The categorization can help the design of federated learning systems as shown in our case studies. By systematically summarizing the existing federated learning systems, we present the design factors, case studies, and future research opportunities.
Qinbin Li, Zeyi Wen, Zhaomin Wu, Sixu Hu, Naibo Wang, Yuan Li 0032, Xu Liu 0014, Bingsheng He
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.5
2019 A Scenario-Based Requirement Model for Crossover Healthcare Service
abstract
As the population ages, eldercare and healthcare have become major issues in recent years. Crossover healthcare services, instead of individual ones, have become the main form of service provision. In this work, a scenario-based requirement model (SBRM) is proposed for crossover healthcare service. A DSL and a prototype system are designed based on the model as well. Our model defines the requirements as: WHO, in what SCENARIOs, what PROCESSes need to be performed, and what RULEs need to be satisfied. We verify our model in the real case of the MEH (medical, eldercare, healthcare) crossover service. SBRM supports the service better in our cases and shows satisfactory efficiency, effectiveness, and reusability.
Meng Xi 0002, Ying Li 0001, Yongna Wei, Naibo Wang, Yuyu Yin, Zhiling Luo, Shuiguang Deng, Yihua Mao, Jianwei Yin
SERVICES4