Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Dong-Gyun Han

dblp:248/2920 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6072-1799ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.912025
Prioritizing Speech Test Cases · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025
Software testing › regression testing
test case prioritization
0.912025
Prioritizing Speech Test Cases · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025
Software testing › test optimization
test case selection
0.312025
Prioritizing Speech Test Cases · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fine-tuning · 1.7error prediction model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Prioritizing Speech Test Cases
abstract
As Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) systems gain widespread acceptance, there is a pressing need to rigorously test and enhance their performance. Nonetheless, the process of collecting and executing speech test cases is typically both costly and time-consuming. This presents a compelling case for the strategic prioritization of speech test cases, which consist of a piece of audio and the corresponding reference text . The central question we address is: In what sequence should speech test cases be collected and executed to identify the maximum number of errors at the earliest stage ? In this study, we introduce PRiOritizing sPeecH tEsT ( Prophet ) cases, a tool designed to predict the likelihood that speech test cases will identify errors. Consequently, Prophet can assess and prioritize these test cases without having to run the ASR system, facilitating large-scale analysis. Our evaluation encompasses \(6\) distinct prioritization techniques across \(3\) ASR systems and \(12\) datasets. When constrained by the same test budget, our approach identified \(15.44\%\) more misrecognized words than the leading state-of-the-art method. We select top-ranked speech test cases from the prioritized list to fine-tune ASR systems and analyze how our approach can improve the ASR system performance. Statistical evaluations show that our method delivers a considerably higher performance boost for ASR systems compared to established baseline techniques. Moreover, our correlation analysis confirms that fine-tuning an ASR system with a dataset where the model initially underperforms tends to yield greater performance improvements.
Zhou Yang 0003, Jieke Shi, Muhammad Hilmi Asyrofi, Xin Zhou 0014, Dong-Gyun Han, David Lo 0001
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.6