Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zachary Brock

dblp:248/3413 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › gait control
gait optimization
0.612022
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
locomotion
0.212022
The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric mechanics · 0.6constraint curvature · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Geometry of Optimal Gaits for Inertia-Dominated Kinematic Systems
abstract
Isolated mechanical systems—e.g., those floating in space, in free-fall, or on a frictionless surface—are able to achieve net rotation by cyclically changing their shape, even if they have no net angular momentum. Similarly, swimmers immersed in “perfect fluids” are able to use cyclic shape changes to both translate and rotate even if the swimmer-fluid system has no net linear or angular momentum. Finally, systems fully constrained by direct nonholonomic constraints (e.g., passive wheels) can push against these constraints to move through the world. Previous work has demonstrated that the displacement induced by these shape changes corresponds to the amount ofconstraint curvaturethat the gaits enclose. Properly assessing or optimizing the utility of a gait also requires considering the time or resources required to execute it: A gait that produces a small displacement per cycle, but that can be executed in a short time, may produce a faster average velocity than a gait that produces more displacement, but takes longer to complete a cycle at the same instantaneous effort. In this paper, we consider gaits under two instantaneous measures of effort. For each of these costs, we demonstrate that fixing the average instantaneous cost to a unit value allows us to transform the effort costs into time-to-execute costs for any given gait cycle. We then illustrate how the interaction between the constraint curvature and these costs leads to characteristic geometries for optimal cycles, in which the gait trajectories resemble elastic hoops distended from within by internal pressures.
Ross L. Hatton, Zachary Brock, Shuoqi Chen, Howie Choset, Hossein Faraji, Ruijie Fu, Nathan Justus, Suresh Ramasamy
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2019 A Comparison of Lateral Dynamic Models for Tractor-Trailer Systems
abstract
In the literature, researchers studying the lateral dynamics of tractor-trailer systems have each developed their own reduced-order lateral dynamic model, each with their own assumptions, state representations, and derivation methods. Little to no work has been performed to compare the accuracy of these models to each other, nor to validate their results against high-fidelity multi-body simulations or real truck data. The purpose of this paper is to identify several reduced-order lateral dynamic models for tractor-trailer systems present in the current literature, simulate their estimated states through common driving maneuvers, and then compare their estimates against reference data from a high-fidelity multi-body dynamic model. From this comparison, we identify the reduced-order model that maintains the least error from the reference data as the best representation of a real tractor-trailer system. The results of our comparison will be useful to researchers interested in using a reduced-order dynamic model from the literature as the basis for articulation angle estimation, model-predictive control, or adaptive control algorithms for autonomous tractor-semitrailer systems.
Zachary Brock, James Nelson, Ross L. Hatton
IV1