Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tung Phan-Minh

dblp:248/5638 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1403-5197ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Autonomous driving · 43% Generative modeling · 20% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction
1.322025
DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving · ICML 2025
CoverNet: Multimodal Behavior Prediction Using Trajectory Sets · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.912025
DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
autoregressive transformer
0.912025
DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving · ICML 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
behavior modeling
0.912025
DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling
0.912025
DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › inconsistency handling
conflict resolution
0.712023
Rules of the Road: Formal Guarantees for Autonomous Vehicles With Behavioral Contract Design · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
multimodal prediction
0.412020
CoverNet: Multimodal Behavior Prediction Using Trajectory Sets · CVPR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.9pre-training · 0.9autoregressive modeling · 0.9simulation · 0.7formal verification · 0.7dynamic trajectory set generation · 0.4classification over trajectory sets · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DriveGPT: Scaling Autoregressive Behavior Models for Driving
abstract
We present DriveGPT, a scalable behavior model for autonomous driving. We model driving as a sequential decision-making task, and learn a transformer model to predict future agent states as tokens in an autoregressive fashion. We scale up our model parameters and training data by multiple orders of magnitude, enabling us to explore the scaling properties in terms of dataset size, model parameters, and compute. We evaluate DriveGPT across different scales in a planning task, through both quantitative metrics and qualitative examples, including closed-loop driving in complex real-world scenarios. In a separate prediction task, DriveGPT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and exhibits improved performance by pretraining on a large-scale dataset, further validating the benefits of data scaling.
Eric M. Wolff, Paul Vernaza, Tung Phan-Minh, Hongge Chen, David S. Hayden, Mark Edmonds, Brian Pierce, Xinxin Chen, Pratik Elias Jacob, Xiaobai Chen, Chingiz Tairbekov, Pratik Agarwal, Tianshi Gao, Yuning Chai, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICML4
2023 DriveIRL: Drive in Real Life with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In this paper, we introduce the first published planner to drive a car in dense, urban traffic using Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL). Our planner, DriveIRL, generates a diverse set of trajectory proposals and scores them with a learned model. The best trajectory is tracked by our self-driving vehicle's low-level controller. We train our trajectory scoring model on a 500+ hour real-world dataset of expert driving demonstrations in Las Vegas within the maximum entropy IRL framework. DriveIRL's benefits include: a simple design due to only learning the trajectory scoring function, a flexible and relatively interpretable feature engineering approach, and strong real-world performance. We validated DriveIRL on the Las Vegas Strip and demonstrated fully autonomous driving in heavy traffic, including scenarios involving cut-ins, abrupt braking by the lead vehicle, and hotel pickup/dropoff zones. Our dataset, a part of nuPlan, has been released to the public to help further research in this area.
Tung Phan-Minh, Forbes Howington, Ting-Sheng Chu, Momchil S. Tomov, Robert E. Beaudoin, Sang Uk Lee, Nanxiang Li, Caglayan Dicle, Samuel Findler, Francisco Suárez-Ruiz, Sammy Omari, Eric M. Wolff
ICRA1
2023 Rules of the Road: Formal Guarantees for Autonomous Vehicles With Behavioral Contract Design
abstract
The problem of safe and fair conflict resolution among inertial, distributed agents—particularly in highly interactive settings—is of paramount importance to the autonomous vehicles industry. The difficulty of solving this problem can be attributed to the fact that agents have to reason over other agents' complex behaviors. We propose the idea of using a behavioral contract to capture a set of explicitly defined assumptions about how all agents in the environment make decisions. In this article, we present a behavioral contract for a specific class of agents that can guarantee the safety and liveness (i.e., progress) of all agents operating in accordance with it. The behavioral contract has two main components—an ordered behavioral rulebook that the agent uses to select its intended action and some additional constraints that define when an agent has precedence (or not) to take its intended action. If all of the agents act according to this contract, we can guarantee safety under all traffic conditions and liveness for all agents under “sparse” traffic conditions. The formalism of the contract also enables assignment of blame. We provide proofs of correctness of the behavioral contract and validate our results in simulation.
Karena X. Cai, Tung Phan-Minh, Soon-Jo Chung, Richard M. Murray
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2020 CoverNet: Multimodal Behavior Prediction Using Trajectory Sets
abstract
We present CoverNet, a new method for multimodal, probabilistic trajectory prediction for urban driving. Previous work has employed a variety of methods, including multimodal regression, occupancy maps, and 1-step stochastic policies. We instead frame the trajectory prediction problem as classification over a diverse set of trajectories. The size of this set remains manageable due to the limited number of distinct actions that can be taken over a reasonable prediction horizon. We structure the trajectory set to a) ensure a desired level of coverage of the state space, and b) eliminate physically impossible trajectories. By dynamically generating trajectory sets based on the agent's current state, we can further improve our method's efficiency. We demonstrate our approach on public, real world self-driving datasets, and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Tung Phan-Minh, Elena Corina Grigore, Freddy A. Boulton, Oscar Beijbom, Eric M. Wolff
CVPR1