While Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise, their tendencies to hallucinate pose significant risks in high-stakes domains like finance, especially when used for regulatory reporting and decision-making. Existing hallucination detection benchmarks fail to capture the complexities of financial benchmarks, which require high numerical precision, nuanced understanding of the language of finance, and ability to handle long-context documents. To address this, we introduce PHANTOM, a novel benchmark dataset for evaluating hallucination detection in long-context financial QA. Our approach first generates a seed dataset of high-quality "query-answer-document (chunk)" triplets, with either hallucinated or correct answers - that are validated by human annotators and subsequently expanded to capture various context lengths and information placements. We demonstrate how PHANTOM allows fair comparison of hallucination detection models and provides insights into LLM performance, offering a valuable resource for improving hallucination detection in financial applications. Further, our benchmarking results highlight the severe challenges out-of-the-box models face in detecting real-world hallucinations on long context data, and establish some promising directions towards alleviating these challenges, by fine-tuning open-source LLMs using PHANTOM.

Soil nutrient estimation can be used as a key input to increase crop yield and agriculture fertilization. Due to the shortage of the ground measured spectrum technology and costliness to obtain hyperspectral images, multispectral remote sensing data is used to explore the soil nutrient content estimation. In this paper, we have used optical remote sensing data (Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2), terrain/climate data (precipitation, radiation, slope etc.) and ground truth value to estimate four nutrients: N, K, P, and OC for two districts of Maharashtra, India. We compared four linear and non-linear regression models: multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest regression (RFR), support vector machine for regression (SVR) and gradient boosting (GB) for estimation of NPK and OC. Comparative results suggest that, GB and RFR performed better than other models with sMAPE in range of 0.125-0.377 for all nutrients, which is better or comparable with literature reported accuracy [1]. Therefore, the approach has potential to generate high resolution (<; ha) soil nutrients map and can reduce soil sampling effort/cost.

Over the last decade, online forums have become primary news sources for readers around the globe, and social media platforms are the space where these news forums find most of their audience and engagement. Our particular focus in this paper is to study conflict dynamics over online news articles in Reddit, one of the most popular online discussion platforms. We choose to study how conflicts develop around news inside a discussion community, the \em r/news subreddit. Mining the characteristics of these engagements often provide useful insights into the behavioral dynamics of large-scale human interactions. Such insights are useful for many reasons -- for news houses to improvise their publishing strategies and potential audience, for data analytics to get a better introspection over media engagement as well as for social media platforms to avoid unnecessary and perilous conflicts. In this work, we present a novel quantification of conflict in online discussion. Unlike previous studies on conflict dynamics, which model conflict as a binary phenomenon, our measure is continuous-valued, which we validate with manually annotated ratings. We address a two-way prediction task. Firstly, we predict the probable degree of conflict a news article will face from its audience. We employ multiple machine learning frameworks for this task using various features extracted from news articles.Secondly, given a pair of users and their interaction history, we predict if their future engagement will result in a conflict. We fuse textual and network-based features together using a support vector machine which achieves an AUC of 0.89. Moreover, we implement a graph convolutional model which exploits engagement histories of users to predict whether a pair of users who never met each other before will have a conflicting interaction, with an AUC of 0.69. We perform our studies on a massive discussion dataset crawled from the Reddit news community, containing over $41k$ news articles and $5.5$ million comments. Apart from the prediction tasks, our studies offer interesting insights on the conflict dynamics -- how users form clusters based on conflicting engagements, how different is the temporal nature of conflict over different online news forums, how is contribution of different language based features to induce conflict, etc. In short, our study paves the way towards new methods of exploration and modeling of conflict dynamics inside online discussion communities.