As machine learning models are deployed in critical applications, robustness against adversarial perturbations is crucial. While numerous defensive algorithms have been proposed to counter such attacks, they typically assume that all adversarial transformations are equally important, an assumption that rarely aligns with real-world applications. To address this, we study the problem of robust learning against adversarial perturbations under cost-sensitive scenarios, where the potential harm of different types of misclassifications is encoded in a cost matrix. Our solution introduces a provably robust learning algorithm to certify and optimize for cost-sensitive robustness, building on the scalable certification framework of randomized smoothing. Specifically, we formalize the definition of cost-sensitive certified radius and propose our novel adaptation of the standard certification algorithm to generate tight robustness certificates tailored to any cost matrix. In addition, we design a robust training method that improves certified cost-sensitive robustness without compromising model accuracy. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets, including challenging ones unsolvable by existing methods, demonstrate the effectiveness of our certification algorithm and training method across various cost-sensitive scenarios.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in generating functional code, leading to numerous AI-based coding program tools. However, their reliance on the perplexity objective during both training and inference primarily emphasizes functionality, often at the expense of efficiency—an essential consideration for real-world coding tasks. Perhaps interestingly, we observed that well-trained LLMs inherently possess knowledge about code efficiency, but this potential remains underutilized with standard decoding approaches. To address this, we design strategic prompts to activate the model’s embedded efficiency understanding, effectively using LLMs as \textit{efficiency critiques} to guide code generation toward higher efficiency without sacrificing—and sometimes even improving—functionality, all without the need for costly real code execution. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets (EffiBench, HumanEval+) across multiple representative code models demonstrate up to a 70.6\% reduction in average execution time and a 13.6\% decrease in maximum memory usage, highlighting the computational efficiency and practicality of our approach compared to existing alternatives.

Despite being prevalent in the general field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), pre-trained language models inherently carry privacy and copyright concerns due to their nature of training on large-scale web-scraped data. In this paper, we pioneer a systematic exploration of such risks associated with pre-trained language encoders, specifically focusing on the membership leakage of pre-training data exposed through downstream models adapted from pre-trained language encoders–an aspect largely overlooked in existing literature. Our study encompasses comprehensive experiments across four types of pre-trained encoder architectures, three representative downstream tasks, and five benchmark datasets. Intriguingly, our evaluations reveal, for the first time, the existence of membership leakage even when only the black-box output of the downstream model is exposed, highlighting a privacy risk far greater than previously assumed. Alongside, we present in-depth analysis and insights toward guiding future researchers and practitioners in addressing the privacy considerations in developing pre-trained language models.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are recognized for their potential to be an important building block toward achieving artificial general intelligence due to their unprecedented capability for solving diverse tasks. Despite these achievements, LLMs often underperform in domain-specific tasks without training on relevant domain data. This phenomenon, which is often attributed to distribution shifts, makes adapting pre-trained LLMs with domain-specific data crucial. However, this adaptation raises significant privacy concerns, especially when the data involved come from sensitive domains. In this work, we extensively investigate the privacy vulnerabilities of adapted (fine-tuned) LLMs and benchmark privacy leakage across a wide range of data modalities, state-of-the-art privacy attack methods, adaptation techniques, and model architectures. We systematically evaluate and pinpoint critical factors related to privacy leakage. With our organized codebase and actionable insights, we aim to provide a standardized auditing tool for practitioners seeking to deploy customized LLM applications with faithful privacy assessments.

Generative models trained with Differential Privacy (DP) are becoming increasingly prominent in the creation of synthetic data for downstream applications. Existing literature, however, primarily focuses on basic benchmarking datasets and tends to report promising results only for elementary metrics and relatively simple data distributions. In this paper, we initiate a systematic analysis of how DP generative models perform in their natural application scenarios, specifically focusing on real-world gene expression data. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of five representative DP generation methods, examining them from various angles, such as downstream utility, statistical properties, and biological plausibility. Our extensive evaluation illuminates the unique characteristics of each DP generation method, offering critical insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and uncovering intriguing possibilities for future developments. Perhaps surprisingly, our analysis reveals that most methods are capable of achieving seemingly reasonable downstream utility, according to the standard evaluation metrics considered in existing literature. Nevertheless, we find that none of the DP methods are able to accurately capture the biological characteristics of the real dataset. This observation suggests a potential over-optimistic assessment of current methodologies in this field and underscores a pressing need for future enhancements in model design.

Conventional gradient-sharing approaches for federated learning (FL), such as FedAvg, rely on aggregation of local models and often face performance degradation under differential privacy (DP) mechanisms or data heterogeneity, which can be attributed to the inconsistency between the local and global objectives. To address this issue, we propose FedLAP-DP, a novel privacy-preserving approach for FL. Our formulation involves clients synthesizing a small set of samples that approximate local loss landscapes by simulating the gradients of real images within a local region. Acting as loss surrogates, these synthetic samples are aggregated on the server side to uncover the global loss landscape and enable global optimization. Building upon these insights, we offer a new perspective to enforce record-level differential privacy in FL. A formal privacy analysis demonstrates that FedLAP-DP incurs the same privacy costs as typical gradient-sharing schemes while achieving an improved trade-off between privacy and utility. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our approach across various datasets with highly skewed distributions in both DP and non-DP settings. Beyond the promising performance, our approach presents a faster convergence speed compared to typical gradient-sharing methods and opens up the possibility of trading communication costs for better performance by sending a larger set of synthetic images. The source is available at https://github.com/a514514772/FedLAP-DP.

Differentially private data generation techniques have become a promising solution to the data privacy challenge –– it enables sharing of data while complying with rigorous privacy guarantees, which is essential for scientific progress in sensitive domains. Unfortunately, restricted by the inherent complexity of modeling high-dimensional distributions, existing private generative models are struggling with the utility of synthetic samples. In contrast to existing works that aim at fitting the complete data distribution, we directly optimize for a small set of samples that are representative of the distribution, which is generally an easier task and more suitable for private training. Moreover, we exploit discriminative information from downstream tasks to further ease the training. Our work provides an alternative view for differentially private generation of high-dimensional data and introduces a simple yet effective method that greatly improves the sample utility of state-of-the-art approaches.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have progressed rapidly during the past decade and have been deployed in various real-world applications. Meanwhile, DNN models have been shown to be vulnerable to security and privacy attacks. One such attack that has attracted a great deal of attention recently is the backdoor attack. Specifically, the adversary poisons the target model’s training set to mislead any input with an added secret trigger to a target class.

Deep learning has achieved overwhelming success, spanning from discriminative models to generative models. In particular, deep generative models have facilitated a new level of performance in a myriad of areas, ranging from media manipulation to sanitized dataset generation. Despite the great success, the potential risks of privacy breach caused by generative models have not been analyzed systematically. In this paper, we focus on membership inference attack against deep generative models that reveals information about the training data used for victim models. Specifically, we present the first taxonomy of membership inference attacks, encompassing not only existing attacks but also our novel ones. In addition, we propose the first generic attack model that can be instantiated in a large range of settings and is applicable to various kinds of deep generative models. Moreover, we provide a theoretically grounded attack calibration technique, which consistently boosts the attack performance in all cases, across different attack settings, data modalities, and training configurations. We complement the systematic analysis of attack performance by a comprehensive experimental study, that investigates the effectiveness of various attacks w.r.t. model type and training configurations, over three diverse application scenarios (i.e., images, medical data, and location data).

The wide-spread availability of rich data has fueled the growth of machine learning applications in numerous domains. However, growth in domains with highly-sensitive data (e.g., medical) is largely hindered as the private nature of data prohibits it from being shared. To this end, we propose Gradient-sanitized Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (GS-WGAN), which allows releasing a sanitized form of the sensitive data with rigorous privacy guarantees. In contrast to prior work, our approach is able to distort gradient information more precisely, and thereby enabling training deeper models which generate more informative samples. Moreover, our formulation naturally allows for training GANs in both centralized and federated (i.e., decentralized) data scenarios. Through extensive experiments, we find our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches across multiple metrics (e.g., sample quality) and datasets.