Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simón Rodríguez Santana
dblp:249/2890
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 86% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
2.0 | 3 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 Deep Variational Implicit Processes · ICLR 2023 Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
linearized laplace approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse variational gaussian process |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Variational Implicit Processes · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
neural network uncertainty |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 2.0stochastic optimization · 0.8RKHS · 0.8inducing-point approximation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Scalable Linearized Laplace Approximation via Surrogate Neural KernelabstractWe introduce a scalable method to approximate the kernel of the Linearized Laplace Approximation (LLA).For this, we use a surrogate deep neural network (DNN) that learns a compact feature representation whose inner product replicates the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK).This avoids the need to compute large Jacobians.Training relies solely on efficient Jacobian-vector products, allowing to compute predictive uncertainty on large-scale pre-trained DNNs.Experimental results show similar or improved uncertainty estimation and calibration compared to existing LLA approximations.Notwithstanding, biasing the learned kernel significantly enhances out-of-distribution detection.This remarks the benefits of the proposed method for finding better kernels than the NTK in the context of LLA to compute prediction uncertainty given a pre-trained DNN. Luis A. Ortega 0001, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
ESANN | 2 |
| 2024 | Variational Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep LearningabstractThe Linearized Laplace Approximation (LLA) has been recently used to perform uncertainty estimation on the predictions of pre-trained deep neural networks (DNNs). However, its widespread application is hindered by significant computational costs, particularly in scenarios with a large number of training points or DNN parameters. Consequently, additional approximations of LLA, such as Kronecker-factored or diagonal approximate GGN matrices, are utilized, potentially compromising the model’s performance. To address these challenges, we propose a new method for approximating LLA using a variational sparse Gaussian Process (GP). Our method is based on the dual RKHS formulation of GPs and retains as the predictive mean the output of the original DNN. Furthermore, it allows for efficient stochastic optimization, which results in sub-linear training time in the size of the training dataset. Specifically, its training cost is independent of the number of training points. We compare our proposed method against accelerated LLA (ELLA), which relies on the Nyström approximation, as well as other LLA variants employing the sample-then-optimize principle. Experimental results, both on regression and classification datasets, show that our method outperforms these already existing efficient variants of LLA, both in terms of the quality of the predictive distribution and in terms of total computational time. Luis A. Ortega 0001, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Deep Variational Implicit Processes
Luis A. Ortega 0001, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit ProcessesabstractImplicit Processes (IPs) represent a flexible framework that can be used to describe a wide variety of models, from Bayesian neural networks, neural samplers and data generators to many others. IPs also allow for approximate inference in function-space. This change of formulation solves intrinsic degenerate problems of parameter-space approximate inference concerning the high number of parameters and their strong dependencies in large models. For this, previous works in the literature have attempted to employ IPs both to set up the prior and to approximate the resulting posterior. However, this has proven to be a challenging task. Existing methods that can tune the prior IP result in a Gaussian predictive distribution, which fails to capture important data patterns. By contrast, methods producing flexible predictive distributions by using another IP to approximate the posterior process cannot tune the prior IP to the observed data. We propose here the first method that can accomplish both goals. For this, we rely on an inducing-point representation of the prior IP, as often done in the context of sparse Gaussian processes. The result is a scalable method for approximate inference with IPs that can tune the prior IP parameters to the data, and that provides accurate non-Gaussian predictive distributions. Simón Rodríguez Santana, Bryan Zaldivar, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Adversarial α-divergence minimization for Bayesian approximate inference
Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-Lobato |
Neurocomputing | 1 |