Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sandeep Srinivasan
dblp:249/8416
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-5594-5536ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 91% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
simulation-based verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prioritized experience replay · 0.8deep deterministic policy gradient · 0.8bayesian optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design VerificationabstractGiven the increasing complexity of integrated circuits, the utilization of machine learning in simulation-based hardware design verification (DV) has become crucial to ensure comprehensive coverage of hard-to-hit states. Our paper proposes a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm combined with prioritized experience replay (PER) to determine the stimulus settings that result in the highest average FIFO depth in a modified exclusive shared invalid (MESI) cache controller architecture. This architecture includes four FIFOs, each corresponding to a distinct CPU. Through extensive experimentation, DDPG coupled with PER (DDPG-PER) proves to be more effective than DDPG with uniform experience replay in enhancing average FIFO depth and coverage within the DV process. Furthermore, our proposed DDPG-PER framework significantly increases the occurrence of higher FIFO depths, thereby addressing the challenges associated with reaching hard-to-hit states in DV. The proposed DDPG-PER and DDPG algorithms also demonstrate a larger average FIFO depth over four CPUs, requiring considerably less execution time than Bayesian Optimization (BO). Zahra Aref, Rohit Suvarna, Bill Hughes, Sandeep Srinivasan, Narayan B. Mandayam |
DAC | 4 |