Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jang Hyun Cho

dblp:249/9432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3654-7505ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 21% 3D vision · 18% Vision and language · 17%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d interpretation
0.912025
Language-Image Models with 3D Understanding · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.912025
Language-Image Models with 3D Understanding · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language pretraining
contrastive vision-language pretraining
0.912025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.912025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
multimodal language modeling
0.912025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Language-Image Models with 3D Understanding · ICLR 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.912025
Language-Image Models with 3D Understanding · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
spatial alignment
0.912025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
vision encoder
0.912025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.812024
Language-Conditioned Detection Transformer · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
open-vocabulary object detection
0.812024
Language-Conditioned Detection Transformer · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
part segmentation
0.712023
PartDistillation: Learning Parts from Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › robust object detection
long-tailed object detection
0.612022
Long-tail Detection with Effective Class-Margins · ECCV (8) 2022
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.512021
PiCIE: Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Using Invariance and Equivariance in Clustering · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
unsupervised semantic segmentation
0.512021
PiCIE: Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Using Invariance and Equivariance in Clustering · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
early stopping
0.412019
On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.412019
On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412019
On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation · ICCV 2019
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video classification
0.312025
Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling
0.212024
Language-Conditioned Detection Transformer · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation
0.212023
PartDistillation: Learning Parts from Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112019
On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation · ICCV 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge distillation · 1.0visual prompting · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9alignment method · 0.9pseudo-labeling · 0.8detection transformer · 0.8self-supervised self-training · 0.7class margin loss · 0.6clustering · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Language-Image Models with 3D Understanding
abstract
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have shown incredible capabilities in a variety of 2D vision and language tasks. We extend MLLMs’ perceptual capabilities to ground and reason about images in 3-dimensional space. To that end, we first develop a large-scale pretraining dataset for 2D and 3D called LV3D by combining multiple existing 2D and 3D recognition datasets under a common task formulation: as multi-turn question-answering. Next, we introduce a new MLLM named CUBE-LLM and pre-train it on LV3D. We show that pure data scaling makes a strong 3D perception capability without 3D specific architectural design or training objective. CUBE-LLM exhibits intriguing properties similar to LLMs: (1) CUBE-LLM can apply chain-of-thought prompting to improve 3D understanding from 2D context information. (2) CUBE-LLM can follow complex and diverse instructions and adapt to versatile input and output formats. (3) CUBE-LLM can be visually prompted such as 2D box or a set of candidate 3D boxes from specialists. Our experiments on outdoor benchmarks demonstrate that CUBE-LLM significantly outperforms existing baselines by 21.3 points of AP-BEV on the Talk2Car dataset for 3D grounded reasoning and 17.7 points on the DriveLM dataset for complex reasoning about driving scenarios, respectively. CUBE-LLM also shows competitive results in general MLLM benchmarks such as refCOCO for 2D grounding with (87.0) average score, as well as visual question answering benchmarks such as VQAv2, GQA, SQA, POPE, etc. for complex reasoning.
Jang Hyun Cho, Boris Ivanovic, Edward Schmerling, Yue Wang 0041, Xinshuo Weng, Boyi Li 0001, Yurong You, Philipp Krähenbühl, Yan Wang 0051, Marco Pavone 0001
ICLR1
2025 Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network
abstract
We introduce Perception Encoder (PE), a family of state-of-the-art vision encoders for image and video understanding. Traditionally, vision encoders have relied on a variety of pretraining objectives, each excelling at different downstream tasks. Surprisingly, after scaling a carefully tuned image pretraining recipe and refining with a robust video data engine, we find that contrastive vision-language training alone can produce strong, general embeddings for all of these downstream tasks. There is only one caveat: these embeddings are hidden within the intermediate layers of the network. To draw them out, we introduce two alignment methods: language alignment for multimodal language modeling, and spatial alignment for dense prediction. Together, our PE family of models achieves state-of-the-art results on a wide variety of tasks, including zero-shot image and video classification and retrieval; document, image, and video Q&A; and spatial tasks such as detection, tracking, and depth estimation. We release our models, code, and novel dataset of synthetically and human-annotated videos: https://github.com/facebookresearch/perception_models
Daniel Bolya, Po-Yao Huang 0001, Peize Sun, Jang Hyun Cho, Andrea Madotto, Chen Wei 0005, Tengyu Ma 0005, Jiale Zhi, Jathushan Rajasegaran, Hanoona Rasheed, Marco Monteiro, Hu Xu 0001, Shiyu Dong, Nikhila Ravi, Shang-Wen Li 0001, Piotr Dollár, Christoph Feichtenhofer
NeurIPS4
2025 PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual Understanding
abstract
Vision-language models are integral to computer vision research, yet many high-performing models remain closed-source, obscuring their data, design and training recipe. The research community has responded by using distillation from black-box models to label training data, achieving strong benchmark results, at the cost of measurable scientific progress. However, without knowing the details of the teacher model and its data sources, scientific progress remains difficult to measure. In this paper, we study building a Perception Language Model (PLM) in a fully open and reproducible framework for transparent research in image and video understanding. We analyze standard training pipelines without distillation from proprietary models and explore large-scale synthetic data to identify critical data gaps, particularly in detailed video understanding. To bridge these gaps, we release 2.8M human-labeled instances of fine-grained video question-answer pairs and spatio-temporally grounded video captions. Additionally, we introduce PLM–VideoBench, a suite for evaluating challenging video understanding tasks focusing on the ability to reason about ''what'', ''where'', ''when'', and ''how'' of a video. We make our work fully reproducible by providing data, training recipes, code & models.
Jang Hyun Cho, Andrea Madotto, Effrosyni Mavroudi, Triantafyllos Afouras, Tushar Nagarajan, Muhammad Maaz 0001, Yale Song, Tengyu Ma 0005, Shuming Hu, Suyog Dutt Jain, Hanoona Abdul Rasheed, Peize Sun, Po-Yao Huang 0001, Daniel Bolya, Nikhila Ravi, Shashank Jain, Tammy Stark, Seungwhan Moon, Babak Damavandi, Vivian Lee, Andrew Westbury, Salman Khan 0001, Philipp Krähenbühl, Piotr Dollár, Lorenzo Torresani, Kristen Grauman, Christoph Feichtenhofer
NeurIPS1
2024 Language-Conditioned Detection Transformer
abstract
We present a new open-vocabulary detection framework. Our framework uses both image-level labels and detailed detection annotations when available. Our framework proceeds in three steps. We first train a language-conditioned object detector on fully-supervised detection data. This detector gets to see the presence or absence of ground truth classes during training, and conditions prediction on the set of present classes. We use this detector to pseudo-label images with image-level labels. Our detector provides much more accurate pseudo-labels than prior approaches with its conditioning mechanism. Finally, we train an unconditioned open-vocabulary detector on the pseudo-annotated images. The resulting detector, named DECOLA, shows strong zero-shot performance in open-vocabulary LVIS benchmark as well as direct zero-shot transfer benchmarks on LVIS, COCO, Object365, and Open/m-ages. DECOLA outperforms the prior arts by 17.1 APrareand 9.4 mAP on zero-shot LVIS benchmark. DECOLA achieves state-of-the-art results in various model sizes, architectures, and datasets by only training on open-sourced data and academic-scale computing. Code is available at https://github.com/janghyuncho/DECOLA.
Jang Hyun Cho, Philipp Krähenbühl
CVPR1
2023 PartDistillation: Learning Parts from Instance Segmentation
abstract
We present a scalable framework to learn part segmentation from object instance labels. State-of-the-art instance segmentation models contain a surprising amount of part information. However, much of this information is hidden from plain view. For each object instance, the part information is noisy, inconsistent, and incomplete. PartDistillation transfers the part information of an instance segmentation model into a part segmentation model through self-supervised self-training on a large dataset. The resulting segmentation model is robust, accurate, and generalizes well. We evaluate the model on various part segmentation datasets. Our model outperforms supervised part segmentation in zero-shot generalization performance by a large margin. Our model outperforms when finetuned on target datasets compared to supervised counterpart and other baselines especially in few-shot regime. Finally, our model provides a wider coverage of rare parts when evaluated over 10K object classes. Code is at https://github.com/facebookresearch/PartDistillation.
Jang Hyun Cho, Philipp Krähenbühl, Vignesh Ramanathan
CVPR1
2022 Long-tail Detection with Effective Class-Margins
Jang Hyun Cho, Philipp Krähenbühl
ECCV (8)1
2021 PiCIE: Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Using Invariance and Equivariance in Clustering
abstract
We present a new framework for semantic segmentation without annotations via clustering. Off-the-shelf clustering methods are limited to curated, single-label, and objectcentric images yet real-world data are dominantly uncurated, multi-label, and scene-centric. We extend clustering from images to pixels and assign separate cluster membership to different instances within each image. However, solely relying on pixel-wise feature similarity fails to learn high-level semantic concepts and overfits to lowlevel visual cues. We propose a method to incorporate geometric consistency as an inductive bias to learn invariance and equivariance for photometric and geometric variations. With our novel learning objective, our framework can learn high-level semantic concepts. Our method, PiCIE (Pixel-level feature Clustering using Invariance and Equivariance), is the first method capable of segmenting both things and stuff categories without any hyperparameter tuning or task-specific pre-processing. Our method largely outperforms existing baselines on COCO [31] and Cityscapes [8] with +17.5 Acc. and +4.5 mIoU. We show that PiCIE gives a better initialization for standard supervised training. The code is available at https://github.com/janghyuncho/PiCIE.
Jang Hyun Cho, Utkarsh Mall, Kavita Bala, Bharath Hariharan
CVPR1
2019 On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillation
abstract
In this paper, we present a thorough evaluation of the efficacy of knowledge distillation and its dependence on student and teacher architectures. Starting with the observation that more accurate teachers often don't make good teachers, we attempt to tease apart the factors that affect knowledge distillation performance. We find crucially that larger models do not often make better teachers. We show that this is a consequence of mismatched capacity, and that small students are unable to mimic large teachers. We find typical ways of circumventing this (such as performing a sequence of knowledge distillation steps) to be ineffective. Finally, we show that this effect can be mitigated by stopping the teacher's training early. Our results generalize across datasets and models.
Jang Hyun Cho, Bharath Hariharan
ICCV1