Shaowu Peng

dblp:25/2221 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 44% Learning theory · 44% Graph learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.112007
An Empirical Study of Object Category Recognition: Sequential Testing with Generalized Samples · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
sequential testing
0.112007
An Empirical Study of Object Category Recognition: Sequential Testing with Generalized Samples · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph matching
0.012007
An Empirical Study of Object Category Recognition: Sequential Testing with Generalized Samples · ICCV 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-down graph matching · 0.1shape context · 0.1graphlet · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Spinal Nerve Segmentation Method and Dataset Construction in Endoscopic Surgical Scenarios
Shaowu Peng, Yongyu Ye, Yunbing Chang, Xiaoqing Zheng
MICCAI (9)1
2023 NRPose: Towards noise resistance for multi-person pose estimation
Jianhang He, Junyao Sun, Qiong Liu 0006, Shaowu Peng
Pattern Recognit.4
2022 Diagnostic Prediction for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Based on Multi-source Data in Electronic Medical Records
Shuhao Zheng, Guoyan Liang, Yongyu Ye, Yunbing Chang, Yi Cai 0001, Shaowu Peng
WISA7
2022 Detail Perception Network for Semantic Segmentation in Water Scenes
Cuixiao Liang, Shaowu Peng
PAKDD (3)3
2018 Nighttime FIR Pedestrian Detection Benchmark Dataset for ADAS
Zhewei Xu, Jiajun Zhuang, Jingkai Zhou, Shaowu Peng
PRCV (4)5
2018 Object tracking via Online Multiple Instance Learning with reliable components
Feng Wu 0004, Shaowu Peng, Jingkai Zhou, Qiong Liu 0006, Xiaojia Xie
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.2
2012 Object categorization with sketch representation and generalized samples
Liang Lin 0004, Xiaobai Liu, Shaowu Peng, Hongyang Chao, Yongtian Wang, Bo Jiang 0002
Pattern Recognit.3
2007 An Empirical Study of Object Category Recognition: Sequential Testing with Generalized Samples
abstract
In this paper we present an empirical study of object category recognition using generalized samples and a set of sequential tests. We study 33 categories, each consisting of a small data set of 30 instances. To increase the amount of training data we have, we use a compositional object model to learn a representation for each category from which we select 30 additional templates with varied appearance from the training set. These samples better span the appearance space and form an augmented training set ΩTof 1980 (60×33) training templates. To perform recognition on a testing image, we use a set of sequential tests to project ΩTinto different representation spaces to narrow the number of candidate matches in ΩT. We use"graphlets"(structural elements), as our local features and model OmegaTat each stage using histograms of graphlets over categories, histograms of graphlets over object instances, histograms of pairs of graphlets over objects, shape context. Each test is increasingly computationally expensive, and by the end of the cascade we have a small candidate set remaining to use with our most powerful test, a top-down graph matching algorithm. We achieve an 81.4 % classification rate on classifying 800 testing images in 33 categories, 15.2% more accurate than a method without generalized samples.
Liang Lin 0004, Shaowu Peng, Jake Porway, Song-Chun Zhu, Yongtian Wang
ICCV2