Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John G. Geske
dblp:25/509
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › structural complexity
complexity class separation |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes · Inf. Comput. 1991 |
Computational complexity
relativization |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Relativizations of Unambiguous and Random Polynomial Time Classes · SIAM J. Comput. 1986 |
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
almost everywhere complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes · Inf. Comput. 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
oracle construction · 0.0immunity · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes
John G. Geske, Dung T. Huynh, Joel I. Seiferas |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 1987 | A Hierarchy Theorem for Almost Everywhere Complex Sets With Application to Polynomial Complexity Degrees
John G. Geske, Dung T. Huynh, Alan L. Selman |
STACS | 1 |
| 1986 | Relativizations of Unambiguous and Random Polynomial Time ClassesabstractWe study relationships between ${\bf P}$, $NP$ , and the unambiguous and random time classes, ${\bf U}$, and ${\bf R}$. Questions concerning these relationships are motivated by complexity issues in public-key cryptosystems. We prove that there exists a recursive oracle A such that ${\bf P}^A \ne {\bf U}^A \ne {\bf NP}^A $, and such that the first inequality is “strong,” i.e., there exists a ${\bf P}^A $-immune set in ${\bf U}^A $. Further, we construct a recursive oracle B such that ${\bf U}^B $ contains an ${\bf R}^B $-immune set. As a corollary, we obtain ${\bf P}^B \ne {\bf R}^B \ne {\bf NP}^B $ and both inequalities are strong. By use of the techniques employed in the proof that ${\bf P}^A \ne {\bf U}^A \ne {\bf NP}^A $, we are also able to solve an open problem raised by Book, Long and Selman [Quantitative relativizations of complexity classes, SIAM J. Comput. 13 (1984), pp 461–487]. John G. Geske, Joachim Grollmann |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |