Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John G. Geske

dblp:25/509 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › structural complexity
complexity class separation
0.011991
A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes · Inf. Comput. 1991
Computational complexity
relativization
0.011986
Relativizations of Unambiguous and Random Polynomial Time Classes · SIAM J. Comput. 1986
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
almost everywhere complexity
0.011991
A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes · Inf. Comput. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

oracle construction · 0.0immunity · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 A Note on Almost-Everywhere-Complex Sets and Separating Deterministic-Time-Complexity Classes
John G. Geske, Dung T. Huynh, Joel I. Seiferas
Inf. Comput.1
1987 A Hierarchy Theorem for Almost Everywhere Complex Sets With Application to Polynomial Complexity Degrees
John G. Geske, Dung T. Huynh, Alan L. Selman
STACS1
1986 Relativizations of Unambiguous and Random Polynomial Time Classes
abstract
We study relationships between ${\bf P}$, $NP$ , and the unambiguous and random time classes, ${\bf U}$, and ${\bf R}$. Questions concerning these relationships are motivated by complexity issues in public-key cryptosystems. We prove that there exists a recursive oracle A such that ${\bf P}^A \ne {\bf U}^A \ne {\bf NP}^A $, and such that the first inequality is “strong,” i.e., there exists a ${\bf P}^A $-immune set in ${\bf U}^A $. Further, we construct a recursive oracle B such that ${\bf U}^B $ contains an ${\bf R}^B $-immune set. As a corollary, we obtain ${\bf P}^B \ne {\bf R}^B \ne {\bf NP}^B $ and both inequalities are strong. By use of the techniques employed in the proof that ${\bf P}^A \ne {\bf U}^A \ne {\bf NP}^A $, we are also able to solve an open problem raised by Book, Long and Selman [Quantitative relativizations of complexity classes, SIAM J. Comput. 13 (1984), pp 461–487].
John G. Geske, Joachim Grollmann
SIAM J. Comput.1