Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tomek Rej

dblp:25/8779 · also Tomasz Rej · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112011
CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011
Recommender systems
content-based recommendation
0.112011
CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011
Recommender systems › user recommendation
reciprocal recommendation
0.112011
CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

collaborative filtering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Recommending people to people: the nature of reciprocal recommenders with a case study in online dating
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Joshua Akehurst, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Judy Kay
User Model. User Adapt. Interact.2
2011 CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating
Joshua Akehurst, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Luiz Pizzato, Judy Kay, Tomek Rej
IJCAI6
2011 Finding Someone You Will Like and Who Won't Reject You
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Kalina Yacef, Irena Koprinska, Judy Kay
UMAP2
2010 RECON: a reciprocal recommender for online dating
abstract
The reciprocal recommender is a class of recommender system that is important for several tasks where people are both the subjects and objects of the recommendation. Some examples are: job recommendation, mentor-mentee matching, and online dating. Despite the importance of this type of recommender, our work is the first to distinguish it and define its properties. We have implemented RECON, a reciprocal recommender for online dating, and have evaluated it on a large dataset from a major Australian dating website. We investigated the predictive power gained by taking account of reciprocity, finding that it is substantial, for example it improved the success rate of the top ten recommendations from 23% to 42% and also improved the recall at the same time. We also found reciprocity to help with the cold start problem obtaining a success rate of 26% for the top ten recommendations for new users. We discuss the implications of these results for broader uses of our approach for other reciprocal recommenders.
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Thomas Chung, Irena Koprinska, Judy Kay
RecSys2
2010 Reciprocal recommender system for online dating
abstract
Reciprocal recommender is a class of recommender systems that is important for tasks where people are both the subject and the object of the recommendation; one such task is online dating. We have implemented RECON, a reciprocal recommender for online dating, and we have evaluated it on a major dating website. Results show an improved success rate for recommendations that consider reciprocity in comparison to recommendations that only consider the preferences of the users receiving the recommendations.
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Thomas Chung, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Judy Kay
RecSys2