Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tomek Rej
dblp:25/8779 · also Tomasz Rej
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011 |
Recommender systems
content-based recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011 |
Recommender systems › user recommendation
reciprocal recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating · IJCAI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
collaborative filtering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Recommending people to people: the nature of reciprocal recommenders with a case study in online dating
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Joshua Akehurst, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Judy Kay |
User Model. User Adapt. Interact. | 2 |
| 2011 | CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating
Joshua Akehurst, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Luiz Pizzato, Judy Kay, Tomek Rej |
IJCAI | 6 |
| 2011 | Finding Someone You Will Like and Who Won't Reject You
Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Kalina Yacef, Irena Koprinska, Judy Kay |
UMAP | 2 |
| 2010 | RECON: a reciprocal recommender for online datingabstractThe reciprocal recommender is a class of recommender system that is important for several tasks where people are both the subjects and objects of the recommendation. Some examples are: job recommendation, mentor-mentee matching, and online dating. Despite the importance of this type of recommender, our work is the first to distinguish it and define its properties. We have implemented RECON, a reciprocal recommender for online dating, and have evaluated it on a large dataset from a major Australian dating website. We investigated the predictive power gained by taking account of reciprocity, finding that it is substantial, for example it improved the success rate of the top ten recommendations from 23% to 42% and also improved the recall at the same time. We also found reciprocity to help with the cold start problem obtaining a success rate of 26% for the top ten recommendations for new users. We discuss the implications of these results for broader uses of our approach for other reciprocal recommenders. Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Thomas Chung, Irena Koprinska, Judy Kay |
RecSys | 2 |
| 2010 | Reciprocal recommender system for online datingabstractReciprocal recommender is a class of recommender systems that is important for tasks where people are both the subject and the object of the recommendation; one such task is online dating. We have implemented RECON, a reciprocal recommender for online dating, and we have evaluated it on a major dating website. Results show an improved success rate for recommendations that consider reciprocity in comparison to recommendations that only consider the preferences of the users receiving the recommendations. Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Thomas Chung, Irena Koprinska, Kalina Yacef, Judy Kay |
RecSys | 2 |