Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krzysztof Lichota

dblp:25/9709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0003-8644-5157ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › data reduction
data deduplication
1.322023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023
InftyDedup: Scalable and Cost-Effective Cloud Tiering with Deduplication · FAST 2023
Storage systems › storage management › storage resource management
cloud tiering
0.712023
InftyDedup: Scalable and Cost-Effective Cloud Tiering with Deduplication · FAST 2023
Storage systems
metadata management
0.712023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023
Storage systems
object storage
0.712023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.712023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.422023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023
InftyDedup: Scalable and Cost-Effective Cloud Tiering with Deduplication · FAST 2023
Storage systems › storage management
backup systems
0.212023
ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed data structures · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 InftyDedup: Scalable and Cost-Effective Cloud Tiering with Deduplication
Iwona Kotlarska, Andrzej Jackowski, Krzysztof Lichota, Michal Welnicki, Cezary Dubnicki, Konrad Iwanicki
FAST3
2023 ObjDedup: High-Throughput Object Storage Layer for Backup Systems With Block-Level Deduplication
abstract
The immense popularity of object storage is also affecting the market of backup. Not only have novel backup solutions emerged that utilize cloud-based object storage as backends, but also support for object storage interfaces is increasingly expected from traditional dedicated backup appliances. This latter trend especially concerns systems with data deduplication, as they can offer compelling gains in storage capacity and throughput. However, such systems have been designed for interfaces and workloads that are markedly different from those encountered in object storage. Notably, they expect data to be written in portions that are orders of magnitude longer than those in the novel object-storage-oriented backup applications. In this light, we contribute twofold. First, contrasting the properties of object storage interfaces with usage patterns from 686 commercial deployments of backup appliances, we identify specific issues an implementation of such an interface has to address to offer adequate performance in a backup system with block-level deduplication. In particular, we show that a major challenge is efficient metadata management. Second, we present distributed data structures and algorithms to handle object metadata in backup systems with block-level deduplication. Subsequently, we implement them as an object storage layer for our HYDRAstor backup system. In comparison to object storage without in-line deduplication, our solution achieves 1.8–3.93x higher write throughput. Compared to object storage on top of a state-of-the-art file-based backup system, it processes 5.26–11.34x more object put operations per time unit.
Andrzej Jackowski, Lukasz Slusarczyk, Krzysztof Lichota, Michal Welnicki, Rafal Wijata, Mateusz Kielar, Tadeusz Kopec, Cezary Dubnicki, Konrad Iwanicki
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3
2019 Securing Cloud Data Under Key Exposure
abstract
Recent news reveal a powerful attacker which breaks data confidentiality by acquiring cryptographic keys, by means of coercion or backdoors in cryptographic software. Once the encryption key is exposed, the only viable measure to preserve data confidentiality is to limit the attacker's access to the ciphertext. This may be achieved, for example, by spreading ciphertext blocks across servers in multiple administrative domains-thus assuming that the adversary cannot compromise all of them. Nevertheless, if data is encrypted with existing schemes, an adversary equipped with the encryption key, can still compromise a single server and decrypt the ciphertext blocks stored therein. In this paper, we study data confidentiality against an adversary which knows the encryption key and has access to a large fraction of the ciphertext blocks. To this end, we propose Bastion, a novel and efficient scheme that guarantees data confidentiality even if the encryption key is leaked and the adversary has access to almost all ciphertext blocks. We analyze the security of Bastion, and we evaluate its performance by means of a prototype implementation. We also discuss practical insights with respect to the integration of Bastion in commercial dispersed storage systems. Our evaluation results suggest that Bastion is well-suited for integration in existing systems since it incurs less than 5 percent overhead compared to existing semantically secure encryption modes.
Ghassan Karame, Claudio Soriente, Krzysztof Lichota, Srdjan Capkun
IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput.3
2011 Anchor-driven subchunk deduplication
abstract
Data deduplication, implemented usually with content defined chunking (CDC), is today one of key features of advanced storage systems providing space for backup applications. Although simple and effective, CDC generates chunks with sizes clustered around expected chunk size, which is globally fixed for a given storage system and applies to all backups. This creates opportunity for improvement, as the optimal chunk size for deduplication varies not only among backup datasets, but also within one dataset: long stretches of unchanged data favor larger chunks, whereas regions of change prefer smaller ones.
Bartlomiej Romanski, Lukasz Heldt, Wojciech Kilian, Krzysztof Lichota, Cezary Dubnicki
SYSTOR4