VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinzhi Bu
dblp:251/3233
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 43% Mathematical optimization · 32% Approximation and online algorithms · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
dynamic pricing |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Context-Based Dynamic Pricing with Partially Linear Demand Model · NeurIPS 2022 Online Pricing with Offline Data: Phase Transition and Inverse Square Law · ICML 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Context-Based Dynamic Pricing with Partially Linear Demand Model · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Context-Based Dynamic Pricing with Partially Linear Demand Model · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning and data management
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Pricing with Offline Data: Phase Transition and Inverse Square Law · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret minimization · 0.9linear demand model · 0.9regret lower bound · 0.6online learning · 0.6hölder continuity · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Context-Based Dynamic Pricing with Partially Linear Demand ModelabstractIn today’s data-rich environment, context-based dynamic pricing has gained much attention. To model the demand as a function of price and context, the existing literature either adopts a parametric model or a non-parametric model. The former is easier to implement but may suffer from model mis-specification, whereas the latter is more robust but does not leverage many structural properties of the underlying problem. This paper combines these two approaches by studying the context-based dynamic pricing with online learning, where the unknown expected demand admits a semi-parametric partially linear structure. Specifically, we consider two demand models, whose expected demand at price $p$ and context $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$ is given by $bp+g(x)$ and $ f(p)+ a^\top x$ respectively. We assume that $g(x)$ is $\beta$-H{\"o}lder continuous in the first model, and $f(p)$ is $k$th-order smooth with an additional parameter $\delta$ in the second model. For both models, we design an efficient online learning algorithm with provable regret upper bounds, and establish matching lower bounds. This enables us to characterize the statistical complexity for the two learning models, whose optimal regret rates are $\widetilde \Theta(\sqrt T \vee T^{\frac{d}{d+2\beta}})$ and $\widetilde \Theta(\sqrt T \vee (\delta T^{k+1})^{\frac{1}{2k+1}})$ respectively. The numerical results demonstrate that our learning algorithms are more effective than benchmark algorithms, and also reveal the effects of parameters $d$, $\beta$ and $\delta$ on the algorithm's empirical regret, which are consistent with our theoretical findings. Jinzhi Bu, David Simchi-Levi, Chonghuan Wang |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Online Pricing with Offline Data: Phase Transition and Inverse Square LawabstractThis paper investigates the impact of pre-existing offline data on online learning, in the context of dynamic pricing. We study a single-product dynamic pricing problem over a selling horizon of T periods. The demand in each period is determined by the price of the product according to a linear demand model with unknown parameters. We assume that the seller already has some pre-existing offline data before the start of the selling horizon. The seller wants to utilize both the pre-existing offline data and the sequential online data to minimize the regret of the online learning process. We characterize the joint effect of the size, location and dispersion of the offline data on the optimal regret of the online learning process. Our results reveal surprising transformations of the optimal regret rate with respect to the size of the offline data, which we refer to as phase transitions. In addition, our results demonstrate that the location and dispersion of the offline data also have an intrinsic effect on the optimal regret, and we quantify this effect via the inverse-square law. Jinzhi Bu, David Simchi-Levi, Yunzong Xu |
ICML | 1 |