Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Greg Benton
dblp:251/9048 · also Gregory W. Benton
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Volatility Based Kernels and Moving Average Means for Accurate Forecasting with Gaussian Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
marginal likelihood |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
stochastic volatility model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Volatility Based Kernels and Moving Average Means for Accurate Forecasting with Gaussian Processes · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensembling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensembling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Residual Pathway Priors for Soft Equivariance Constraints · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensembling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Residual Pathway Priors for Soft Equivariance Constraints · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › out-of-distribution generalization
invariant learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Invariances in Neural Networks from Training Data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
learned data augmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Invariances in Neural Networks from Training Data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Function-Space Distributions over Kernels · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and Generalization · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process inference · 0.6covariance function · 0.6conditional marginal likelihood · 0.6bayesian inference · 0.6simplicial complex · 0.5residual pathway priors · 0.5mode connectivity · 0.5data augmentation · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4elliptical slice sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Volatility Based Kernels and Moving Average Means for Accurate Forecasting with Gaussian ProcessesabstractA broad class of stochastic volatility models are defined by systems of stochastic differential equations, and while these models have seen widespread success in domains such as finance and statistical climatology, they typically lack an ability to condition on historical data to produce a true posterior distribution. To address this fundamental limitation, we show how to re-cast a class of stochastic volatility models as a hierarchical Gaussian process (GP) model with specialized covariance functions. This GP model retains the inductive biases of the stochastic volatility model while providing the posterior predictive distribution given by GP inference. Within this framework, we take inspiration from well studied domains to introduce a new class of models, Volt and Magpie, that significantly outperform baselines in stock and wind speed forecasting, and naturally extend to the multitask setting. Greg Benton, Wesley J. Maddox, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and GeneralizationabstractHow do we compare between hypotheses that are entirely consistent with observations? The marginal likelihood (aka Bayesian evidence), which represents the probability of generating our observations from a prior, provides a distinctive approach to this foundational question, automatically encoding Occam’s razor. Although it has been observed that the marginal likelihood can overfit and is sensitive to prior assumptions, its limitations for hyperparameter learning and discrete model comparison have not been thoroughly investigated. We first revisit the appealing properties of the marginal likelihood for learning constraints and hypothesis testing. We then highlight the conceptual and practical issues in using the marginal likelihood as a proxy for generalization. Namely, we show how marginal likelihood can be negatively correlated with generalization, with implications for neural architecture search, and can lead to both underfitting and overfitting in hyperparameter learning. We provide a partial remedy through a conditional marginal likelihood, which we show is more aligned with generalization, and practically valuable for large-scale hyperparameter learning, such as in deep kernel learning. Sanae Lotfi, Pavel Izmailov, Greg Benton, Micah Goldblum, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast EnsemblingabstractWith a better understanding of the loss surfaces for multilayer networks, we can build more robust and accurate training procedures. Recently it was discovered that independently trained SGD solutions can be connected along one-dimensional paths of near-constant training loss. In this paper, we in fact demonstrate the existence of mode-connecting simplicial complexes that form multi-dimensional manifolds of low loss, connecting many independently trained models. Building on this discovery, we show how to efficiently construct simplicial complexes for fast ensembling, outperforming independently trained deep ensembles in accuracy, calibration, and robustness to dataset shift. Notably, our approach is easy to apply and only requires a few training epochs to discover a low-loss simplex. Greg Benton, Wesley J. Maddox, Sanae Lotfi, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Residual Pathway Priors for Soft Equivariance ConstraintsabstractModels such as convolutional neural networks restrict the hypothesis space to a set of functions satisfying equivariance constraints, and improve generalization in problems by capturing relevant symmetries. However, symmetries are often only partially respected, preventing models with restriction biases from fitting the data. We introduce Residual Pathway Priors (RPPs) as a method for converting hard architectural constraints into soft priors, guiding models towards structured solutions while retaining the ability to capture additional complexity. RPPs are resilient to approximate or misspecified symmetries, and are as effective as fully constrained models even when symmetries are exact. We show that RPPs provide compelling performance on both model-free and model-based reinforcement learning problems, where contact forces and directional rewards violate the assumptions of equivariant networks. Finally, we demonstrate that RPPs have broad applicability, including dynamical systems, regression, and classification. Marc Finzi, Greg Benton, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning Invariances in Neural Networks from Training DataabstractInvariances to translations have imbued convolutional neural networks with powerful generalization properties. However, we often do not know a priori what invariances are present in the data, or to what extent a model should be invariant to a given augmentation. We show how to learn invariances by parameterizing a distribution over augmentations and optimizing the training loss simultaneously with respect to the network parameters and augmentation parameters. With this simple procedure we can recover the correct set and extent of invariances on image classification, regression, segmentation, and molecular property prediction from a large space of augmentations, on training data alone. We show our approach is competitive with methods that are specialized to each task with the appropriate hard-coded invariances, without providing any prior knowledge of which invariance is needed. Greg Benton, Marc Finzi, Pavel Izmailov, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Function-Space Distributions over KernelsabstractGaussian processes are flexible function approximators, with inductive biases controlled by a covariance kernel. Learning the kernel is the key to representation learning and strong predictive performance. In this paper, we develop functional kernel learning (FKL) to directly infer functional posteriors over kernels. In particular, we place a transformed Gaussian process over a spectral density, to induce a non-parametric distribution over kernel functions. The resulting approach enables learning of rich representations, with support for any stationary kernel, uncertainty over the values of the kernel, and an interpretable specification of a prior directly over kernels, without requiring sophisticated initialization or manual intervention. We perform inference through elliptical slice sampling, which is especially well suited to marginalizing posteriors with the strongly correlated priors typical to function space modeling. We develop our approach for non-uniform, large-scale, multi-task, and multidimensional data, and show promising performance in a wide range of settings, including interpolation, extrapolation, and kernel recovery experiments. Greg Benton, Wesley J. Maddox, Jayson P. Salkey, Julio Albinati, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 1 |