Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
M. Ashraf Siddiquee
dblp:251/9646
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hierarchical neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Septor: Seismic Depth Estimation Using Hierarchical Neural Networks · KDD 2022 |
Environmental and earth informatics
seismology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Septor: Seismic Depth Estimation Using Hierarchical Neural Networks · KDD 2022 |
Environmental and earth informatics › seismology
seismic monitoring |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FASER: Seismic Phase Identifier for Automated Monitoring · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › hybrid neural network
convolutional and recurrent networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | FASER: Seismic Phase Identifier for Automated Monitoring · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical neural network · 1.1long short-term memory · 1.0convolutional neural network · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Septor: Seismic Depth Estimation Using Hierarchical Neural NetworksabstractThe depth of a seismic event is an essential feature to discriminate natural earthquakes from events induced or created by humans. However, estimating the depth of a seismic event with a sparse set of seismic stations is a daunting task, and there is no globally usable method. This paper focuses on developing a machine learning model to accurately estimate the depth of arbitrary seismic events directly from seismograms. Our proposed deep learning architecture is not-so-deep compared to commonly found models in the literature for related tasks, consisting of two loosely connected levels of neural networks, associated with the seismic stations at the higher level and the individual channels of a station at the lower level. Thus, the model has significant advantages, including a reduced number of parameters for tuning and better interpretability to geophysicists. We evaluate our solution on seismic data collected from the SCEDC (Southern California Earthquake Data Center) catalog for regional events in California. The model can learn waveform features specific to a set of stations, while it struggles to generalize to completely novel sets of event sources and stations. In a simplified setting of separating shallow events from deep ones, the model achieved an 86.5% F1-score using the Southern California stations. M. Ashraf Siddiquee, Vinícius M. A. de Souza, Glenn Eli Baker, Abdullah Mueen |
KDD | 1 |
| 2021 | FASER: Seismic Phase Identifier for Automated MonitoringabstractSeismic phase identification classifies the type of seismic wave received at a station based on the waveform (i.e., time series) recorded by a seismometer. Automated phase identification is an integrated component of large scale seismic monitoring applications, including earthquake warning systems and underground explosion monitoring. Accurate, fast, and fine-grained phase identification is instrumental for earthquake location estimation, understanding Earth's crustal and mantle structure for predictive modeling, etc. However, existing operational systems utilize multiple nearby stations for precise identification, which delays response time with added complexity and manual interventions. Moreover, single-station systems mostly perform coarse phase identification. In this paper, we revisit the seismic phase classification as an integrated part of a seismic processing pipeline. We develop a machine-learned model FASER, that takes input from a signal detector and produces phase types as output for a signal associator. The model is a combination of convolutional and long short-term memory networks. Our method identifies finer wave types, including crustal and mantle phases. We conduct comprehensive experiments on real datasets to show that FASER outperforms existing baselines. We evaluate FASER holding out sources and stations across the world to demonstrate consistent performance for novel sources and stations. Farhan Asif Chowdhury, M. Ashraf Siddiquee, Glenn Eli Baker, Abdullah Mueen |
KDD | 2 |
| 2019 | SeiSMo: Semi-supervised Time Series Motif Discovery for Seismic Signal DetectionabstractUnlike semi-supervised clustering, classification and rule discovery; semi-supervised motif discovery is a surprisingly unexplored area in data mining. Semi-supervised Motif Discovery finds hidden patterns in long time series when a few arbitrarily known patterns are given. A naive approach is to exploit the known patterns and perform similarity search within a radius of the patterns. However, this method would find only similar shapes and would be limited in discovering new shapes. In contrast, traditional unsupervised motif discovery algorithms detect new shapes, while missing some patterns because the given information is not utilized. We propose a semi-supervised motif discovery algorithm that forms a nearest neighbor graph to identify chains of nearest neighbors from the given events. We demonstrate that the chains are likely to identify hidden patterns in the data. We have applied the method to find novel events in several geoscientific datasets more accurately than existing methods. M. Ashraf Siddiquee, Zeinab Akhavan, Abdullah Mueen |
CIKM | 1 |