Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle Diller

dblp:252/4233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Software-defined and programmable networks · 77% Internet of things and sensor networks · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › security policy
security policy verification
0.412019
Proof-Carrying Network Code · CCS 2019
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot security
0.112019
Proof-Carrying Network Code · CCS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proof-carrying code · 0.8proof-carrying authorization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Proof-Carrying Network Code
abstract
Computer networks often serve as the first line of defense against malicious attacks. Although there are a growing number of tools for defining and enforcing security policies in software-defined networks (SDNs), most assume a single point of control and are unable to handle the challenges that arise in networks with multiple administrative domains. For example, consumers may want want to allow their home IoT networks to be configured by device vendors, which raises security and privacy concerns. In this paper we propose a framework called Proof-Carrying Network Code (PCNC) for specifying and enforcing security in SDNs with interacting administrative domains. Like Proof-Carrying Authorization (PCA), PCNC provides methods for managing authorization domains, and like Proof-Carrying Code (PCC), PCNC provides methods for enforcing behavioral properties of network programs. We develop theoretical foundations for PCNC and evaluate it in simulated and real network settings, including a case study that considers security in IoT networks for home health monitoring.
Christian Skalka, John H. Ring, David Darais, Minseok Kwon, Sahil Gupta, Kyle Diller, Steffen Smolka, Nate Foster
CCS6