Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

George Markomanolis

dblp:252/4622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 88% High-performance computing · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
flash and SSD
0.412019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
parallel file system
0.412019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
Storage systems › i/o architecture
i/o subsystem
0.112019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.112019
End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem · SC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

end-to-end i/o solution · 0.4data movement · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 End-to-end I/O portfolio for the summit supercomputing ecosystem
abstract
The I/O subsystem for the Summit supercomputer, No. 1 on the Top500 list, and its ecosystem of analysis platforms is composed of two distinct layers, namely the in-system layer and the center-wide parallel file system layer (PFS), Spider 3. The in-system layer uses node-local SSDs and provides 26.7 TB/s for reads, 9.7 TB/s for writes, and 4.6 billion IOPS to Summit. The Spider 3 PFS layer uses IBM's Spectrum Scale™ and provides 2.5 TB/s and 2.6 million IOPS to Summit and other systems. While deploying them as two distinct layers was operationally efficient, it also presented usability challenges in terms of multiple mount points and lack of transparency in data movement. To address these challenges, we have developed novel end-to-end I/O solutions for the concerted use of the two storage layers. We present the I/O subsystem architecture, the end-to-end I/O solution space, their design considerations and our deployment experience.
Sarp Oral, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, Feiyi Wang, Christopher Zimmer 0001, Christopher Brumgard, Jesse Hanley, George Markomanolis, Ross G. Miller, Dustin Leverman, Scott Atchley, Verónica G. Vergara Larrea
SC7