Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ayal Klein

dblp:252/5395 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2665-7898ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 80% Question answering and dialogue systems · 13% Deep learning architectures and training · 4%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
implicit argument prediction
0.812024
Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.612022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
question-answer driven semantic role labeling
0.512021
QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.412020
QADiscourse - Discourse Relations as QA Pairs: Representation, Crowdsourcing and Baselines · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse relation recognition
0.412020
QADiscourse - Discourse Relations as QA Pairs: Representation, Crowdsourcing and Baselines · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.412020
Controlled Crowdsourcing for High-Quality QA-SRL Annotation · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation
0.212022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.112021
QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourcing · 0.9sequence-to-sequence language model · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6crowd annotation · 0.5QA-based alignment modeling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries
abstract
Paul Roit, Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Ayal Klein, Valentina Pyatkin, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Paul Roit, Aviv Slobodkin, Eran Hirsch, Arie Cattan, Ayal Klein, Valentina Pyatkin, Ido Dagan
ACL (1)5
2022 QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics
abstract
Various works suggest the appeal of incorporating explicit semantic representations when addressing challenging realistic NLP scenarios.Common approaches offer either comprehensive linguistically-based formalisms, like AMR, or alternatively Open-IE, which provides a shallow and partial representation.More recently, an appealing trend introduces semi-structured natural-language structures as an intermediate meaning-capturing representation, often in the form of questions and answers.In this work, we further promote this line of research by considering three prior QA-based semantic representations.These cover verbal, nominalized and discourse-based predications, regarded here as jointly providing a comprehensive representation of textual informationtermed QASem.To facilitate this perspective, we investigate how to best utilize pre-trained sequence-to-sequence language models, which seem particularly promising for generating representations that consist of natural language expressions (questions and answers).In particular, we examine and analyze input and output linearization strategies, as well as data augmentation and multitask learning for a scarce training data setup.Consequently, we release the first unified QASem parsing tool, easily applicable for downstream tasks that can benefit from an explicit semi-structured account of information units in text.
Ayal Klein, Eran Hirsch, Ron Eliav, Valentina Pyatkin, Avi Caciularu, Ido Dagan
EMNLP1
2021 QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions
abstract
Multi-text applications, such as multidocument summarization, are typically required to model redundancies across related texts.Current methods confronting consolidation struggle to fuse overlapping information.In order to explicitly represent content overlap, we propose to align predicate-argument relations across texts, providing a potential scaffold for information consolidation.We go beyond clustering coreferring mentions, and instead model overlap with respect to redundancy at a propositional level, rather than merely detecting shared referents.Our setting exploits QA-SRL, utilizing question-answer pairs to capture predicate-argument relations, facilitating laymen annotation of cross-text alignments.We employ crowd-workers for constructing a dataset of QA-based alignments, and present a baseline QA alignment model trained over our dataset.Analyses show that our new task is semantically challenging, capturing content overlap beyond lexical similarity and complements cross-document coreference with proposition-level links, offering potential use for downstream tasks.
Daniela Brook Weiss, Paul Roit, Ayal Klein, Ori Ernst, Ido Dagan
EMNLP (1)3
2020 Controlled Crowdsourcing for High-Quality QA-SRL Annotation
abstract
Paul Roit, Ayal Klein, Daniela Stepanov, Jonathan Mamou, Julian Michael, Gabriel Stanovsky, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2020.
Paul Roit, Ayal Klein, Daniela Stepanov, Jonathan Mamou, Julian Michael, Gabriel Stanovsky, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ido Dagan
ACL2
2020 QANom: Question-Answer driven SRL for Nominalizations
abstract
Ayal Klein, Jonathan Mamou, Valentina Pyatkin, Daniela Stepanov, Hangfeng He, Dan Roth, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ido Dagan. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2020.
Ayal Klein, Jonathan Mamou, Valentina Pyatkin, Daniela Stepanov, Hangfeng He 0001, Dan Roth 0001, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ido Dagan
COLING1
2020 QADiscourse - Discourse Relations as QA Pairs: Representation, Crowdsourcing and Baselines
abstract
Discourse relations describe how two propositions relate to one another, and identifying them automatically is an integral part of natural language understanding.However, annotating discourse relations typically requires expert annotators.Recently, different semantic aspects of a sentence have been represented and crowd-sourced via question-and-answer (QA) pairs.This paper proposes a novel representation of discourse relations as QA pairs, which in turn allows us to crowd-source widecoverage data annotated with discourse relations, via an intuitively appealing interface for composing such questions and answers.Based on our proposed representation, we collect a novel and wide-coverage QADiscourse dataset, and present baseline algorithms for predicting QADiscourse relations.
Valentina Pyatkin, Ayal Klein, Reut Tsarfaty, Ido Dagan
EMNLP (1)2