Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir A. Kobzar

dblp:252/5617 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 87% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.412020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice
0.412020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.412020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control
0.412020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020
Mathematical optimization
potential function
0.412020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
zero-sum game
0.112020
New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supersolutions · 0.9subsolutions · 0.9partial differential equations · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice
abstract
This work addresses the classic machine learning problem of online prediction with expert advice. We consider the finite-horizon version of this zero-sum, two-person game. Using verification arguments from optimal control theory, we view the task of finding better lower and upper bounds on the value of the game (regret) as the problem of finding better sub- and supersolutions of certain partial differential equations (PDEs). These sub- and supersolutions serve as the potentials for player and adversary strategies, which lead to the corresponding bounds. To get explicit bounds, we use closed-form solutions of specific PDEs. Our bounds hold for any given number of experts and horizon; in certain regimes (which we identify) they improve upon the previous state of the art. For two and three experts, our bounds provide the optimal leading order term.
Vladimir A. Kobzar, Robert V. Kohn, Zhilei Wang
COLT1