Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Enrique Fita Sanmartin

dblp:252/5618 · also Enrique Fita Sanmartín · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 56% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Mathematical optimization · 18%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning paradigms · 40% Segmentation and scene understanding · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › spectral graph theory
effective resistance
0.922021
Directed Probabilistic Watershed · NeurIPS 2021
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph learning
graph-based semi-supervised learning
0.922021
Directed Probabilistic Watershed · NeurIPS 2021
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spectral graph theory
0.922021
Directed Probabilistic Watershed · NeurIPS 2021
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Algorithms and data structures › signal processing algorithms
watershed algorithm
0.922021
Directed Probabilistic Watershed · NeurIPS 2021
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra › algebraic algorithms
algebraic path problem
0.612022
The Algebraic Path Problem for Graph Metrics · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.612022
Theory and Approximate Solvers for Branched Optimal Transport with Multiple Sources · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › network optimization
network topology optimization
0.612022
Theory and Approximate Solvers for Branched Optimal Transport with Multiple Sources · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.612022
Theory and Approximate Solvers for Branched Optimal Transport with Multiple Sources · NeurIPS 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.612022
The Algebraic Path Problem for Graph Metrics · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
graph-based semi-supervised learning
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › interactive segmentation
seeded segmentation
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
directed graph
0.512021
Directed Probabilistic Watershed · NeurIPS 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph cut
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
karger's algorithm
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
minimum cut
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.512021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › spanning forest
minimum spanning forest
0.412019
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
spanning forest
0.412019
Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning · NeurIPS 2019
Computational geometry
geometric optimization
0.212022
Theory and Approximate Solvers for Branched Optimal Transport with Multiple Sources · NeurIPS 2022
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112021
Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gibbs distribution · 1.8random walker · 1.5harmonic energy minimization · 1.5contraction algorithm · 1.5matrix-tree theorem · 0.9matrix tree theorem · 0.9semiring theory · 0.6geometric optimization · 0.6combinatorial optimization · 0.6bimonoid theory · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Algebraic Path Problem for Graph Metrics
abstract
Finding paths with optimal properties is a foundational problem in computer science. The notions of shortest paths (minimal sum of edge costs), minimax paths (minimal maximum edge weight), reliability of a path and many others all arise as special cases of the "algebraic path problem" (APP). Indeed, the APP formalizes the relation between different semirings such as min-plus, min-max and the distances they induce. We here clarify, for the first time, the relation between the potential distance and the log-semiring. We also define a new unifying family of algebraic structures that include all above-mentioned path problems as well as the commute cost and others as special or limiting cases. The family comprises not only semirings but also strong bimonoids (that is, semirings without distributivity). We call this new and very general distance the "log-norm distance". Finally, we derive some sufficient conditions which ensure that the APP associated with a semiring defines a metric over an arbitrary graph.
Enrique Fita Sanmartin, Sebastian Damrich, Fred A. Hamprecht
ICML1
2022 Theory and Approximate Solvers for Branched Optimal Transport with Multiple Sources
abstract
Branched optimal transport (BOT) is a generalization of optimal transport in which transportation costs along an edge are subadditive. This subadditivity models an increase in transport efficiency when shipping mass along the same route, favoring branched transportation networks. We here study the NP-hard optimization of BOT networks connecting a finite number of sources and sinks in $\mathbb{R}^2$. First, we show how to efficiently find the best geometry of a BOT network for many sources and sinks, given a topology. Second, we argue that a topology with more than three edges meeting at a branching point is never optimal. Third, we show that the results obtained for the Euclidean plane generalize directly to optimal transportation networks on two-dimensional Riemannian manifolds. Finally, we present a simple but effective approximate BOT solver combining geometric optimization with a combinatorial optimization of the network topology.
Peter Lippmann, Enrique Fita Sanmartin, Fred A. Hamprecht
NeurIPS2
2021 Extensions of Karger's Algorithm: Why They Fail in Theory and How They Are Useful in Practice
abstract
The minimum graph cut and minimum s-t-cut problems are important primitives in the modeling of combinatorial problems in computer science, including in computer vision and machine learning. Some of the most efficient algorithms for finding global minimum cuts are randomized algorithms based on Karger’s groundbreaking contraction algorithm. Here, we study whether Karger’s algorithm can be successfully generalized to other cut problems. We first prove that a wide class of natural generalizations of Karger’s algorithm cannot efficiently solve the s-t-mincut or the normalized cut problem to optimality. However, we then present a simple new algorithm for seeded segmentation / graph-based semi-supervised learning that is closely based on Karger’s original algorithm, showing that for these problems, extensions of Karger’s algorithm can be useful. The new algorithm has linear asymptotic runtime and yields a potential that can be interpreted as the posterior probability of a sample belonging to a given seed / class. We clarify its relation to the random walker algorithm / harmonic energy minimization in terms of distributions over spanning forests. On classical problems from seeded image segmentation and graph-based semi-supervised learning on image data, the method performs at least as well as the random walker / harmonic energy minimization / Gaussian processes.
Erik Jenner, Enrique Fita Sanmartin, Fred A. Hamprecht
ICCV2
2021 Directed Probabilistic Watershed
abstract
The Probabilistic Watershed is a semi-supervised learning algorithm applied on undirected graphs. Given a set of labeled nodes (seeds), it defines a Gibbs probability distribution over all possible spanning forests disconnecting the seeds. It calculates, for every node, the probability of sampling a forest connecting a certain seed with the considered node. We propose the "Directed Probabilistic Watershed", an extension of the Probabilistic Watershed algorithm to directed graphs. Building on the Probabilistic Watershed, we apply the Matrix Tree Theorem for directed graphs and define a Gibbs probability distribution over all incoming directed forests rooted at the seeds. Similar to the undirected case, this turns out to be equivalent to the Directed Random Walker. Furthermore, we show that in the limit case in which the Gibbs distribution has infinitely low temperature, the labeling of the Directed Probabilistic Watershed is equal to the one induced by the incoming directed forest of minimum cost. Finally, for illustration, we compare the empirical performance of the proposed method with other semi-supervised segmentation methods for directed graphs.
Enrique Fita Sanmartin, Sebastian Damrich, Fred A. Hamprecht
NeurIPS1
2019 Probabilistic Watershed: Sampling all spanning forests for seeded segmentation and semi-supervised learning
abstract
The seeded Watershed algorithm / minimax semi-supervised learning on a graph computes a minimum spanning forest which connects every pixel / unlabeled node to a seed / labeled node. We propose instead to consider all possible spanning forests and calculate, for every node, the probability of sampling a forest connecting a certain seed with that node. We dub this approach "Probabilistic Watershed". Leo Grady (2006) already noted its equivalence to the Random Walker / Harmonic energy minimization. We here give a simpler proof of this equivalence and establish the computational feasibility of the Probabilistic Watershed with Kirchhoff's matrix tree theorem. Furthermore, we show a new connection between the Random Walker probabilities and the triangle inequality of the effective resistance. Finally, we derive a new and intuitive interpretation of the Power Watershed.
Enrique Fita Sanmartin, Sebastian Damrich, Fred A. Hamprecht
NeurIPS1