VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zacharias Heinrich
dblp:252/5883
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4566-8031ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Dynamic Kernels for Hitting Sets and Set PackingabstractAbstract Computing small kernels for the hitting set problem is a well-studied computational problem where we are given a hypergraph with n vertices and m hyperedges, each of size d for some small constant d, and a parameter k. The task is to compute a new hypergraph, called a kernel, whose size is polynomial with respect to the parameter k and which has a size-k hitting set if, and only if, the original hypergraph has one. State-of-the-art algorithms compute kernels of size $$k^d$$ k d (which is a polynomial as d is a constant), and they do so in time $$m\cdot 2^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ m · 2 d poly ( d ) for a small polynomial $${\text {poly}}(d)$$ poly ( d ) (which is linear in the hypergraph size for d fixed). We generalize this task to the dynamic setting where hyperedges may continuously be added or deleted and one constantly has to keep track of a size- $$k^d$$ k d kernel. This paper presents a deterministic solution with worst-case time $$3^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 3 d poly ( d ) for updating the kernel upon inserts and time $$5^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 5 d poly ( d ) for updates upon deletions. These bounds nearly match the time $$2^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 2 d poly ( d ) needed by the best static algorithm per hyperedge. Let us stress that for constant d our algorithm maintains a hitting set kernel with constant, deterministic, worst-case update time that is independent of n, m, and the parameter k. As a consequence, we also get a deterministic dynamic algorithm for keeping track of size-k hitting sets in d-hypergraphs with update times O(1) and query times $$O(c^k)$$ O ( c k ) where $$c = d - 1 + O(1/d)$$ c = d - 1 + O ( 1 / d ) equals the best base known for the static setting. Max Bannach, Zacharias Heinrich, Rüdiger Reischuk, Till Tantau |
Algorithmica | 2 |
| 2021 | Dynamic Kernels for Hitting Sets and Set PackingabstractComputing small kernels for the hitting set problem is a well-studied computational problem where we are given a hypergraph with n vertices and m hyperedges, each of size d for some small constant d, and a parameter k. The task is to compute a new hypergraph, called a kernel, whose size is polynomial with respect to the parameter k and which has a size-k hitting set if, and only if, the original hypergraph has one. State-of-the-art algorithms compute kernels of size k^d (which is a polynomial kernel size as d is a constant), and they do so in time m⋅ 2^d poly(d) for a small polynomial poly(d) (which is a linear runtime as d is again a constant). We generalize this task to the dynamic setting where hyperedges may continuously be added or deleted and one constantly has to keep track of a size-k^d hitting set kernel in memory (including moments when no size-k hitting set exists). This paper presents a deterministic solution with worst-case time 3^d poly(d) for updating the kernel upon hyperedge inserts and time 5^d poly(d) for updates upon deletions. These bounds nearly match the time 2^d poly(d) needed by the best static algorithm per hyperedge. Let us stress that for constant d our algorithm maintains a dynamic hitting set kernel with constant, deterministic, worst-case update time that is independent of n, m, and the parameter k. As a consequence, we also get a deterministic dynamic algorithm for keeping track of size-k hitting sets in d-hypergraphs with update times O(1) and query times O(c^k) where c = d - 1 + O(1/d) equals the best base known for the static setting. Max Bannach, Zacharias Heinrich, Rüdiger Reischuk, Till Tantau |
IPEC | 2 |