Sateesh Kumar

dblp:253/0475 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 60% Representation and self-supervised learning · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action segmentation
0.612022
Unsupervised Action Segmentation by Joint Representation Learning and Online Clustering · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
clustering-based representation learning
0.612022
Unsupervised Action Segmentation by Joint Representation Learning and Online Clustering · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action segmentation
unsupervised action segmentation
0.612022
Unsupervised Action Segmentation by Joint Representation Learning and Online Clustering · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.512021
Learning by Aligning Videos in Time · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video representation learning
0.512021
Learning by Aligning Videos in Time · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal regularization · 0.6temporal optimal transport · 0.6online clustering · 0.6soft-DTW · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Unsupervised Action Segmentation by Joint Representation Learning and Online Clustering
abstract
We present a novel approach for unsupervised activity segmentation which uses video frame clustering as a pretext task and simultaneously performs representation learning and online clustering. This is in contrast with prior works where representation learning and clustering are often performed sequentially. We leverage temporal information in videos by employing temporal optimal transport. In particular, we incorporate a temporal regularization term which preserves the temporal order of the activity into the standard optimal transport module for computing pseudo-label cluster assignments. The temporal optimal transport module enables our approach to learn effective representations for unsupervised activity segmentation. Furthermore, previous methods require storing learned features for the entire dataset before clustering them in an offline manner, whereas our approach processes one mini-batch at a time in an online manner. Extensive evaluations on three public datasets, i.e. 50-Salads, YouTube Instructions, and Breakfast, and our dataset, i.e., Desktop Assembly, show that our approach performs on par with or better than previous methods, despite having significantly less memory constraints.
Sateesh Kumar, Sanjay Haresh, Andrey Konin, M. Zeeshan Zia, Quoc-Huy Tran
CVPR1
2021 Learning by Aligning Videos in Time
abstract
We present a self-supervised approach for learning video representations using temporal video alignment as a pretext task, while exploiting both frame-level and video-level information. We leverage a novel combination of temporal alignment loss and temporal regularization terms, which can be used as supervision signals for training an encoder network. Specifically, the temporal alignment loss (i.e., Soft-DTW) aims for the minimum cost for temporally aligning videos in the embedding space. However, optimizing solely for this term leads to trivial solutions, particularly, one where all frames get mapped to a small cluster in the embedding space. To overcome this problem, we propose a temporal regularization term (i.e., Contrastive-IDM) which encourages different frames to be mapped to different points in the embedding space. Extensive evaluations on various tasks, including action phase classification, action phase progression, and fine-grained frame retrieval, on three datasets, namely Pouring, Penn Action, and IKEA ASM, show superior performance of our approach over state-of-the-art methods for self-supervised representation learning from videos. In addition, our method provides significant performance gain where labeled data is lacking.
Sanjay Haresh, Sateesh Kumar, Huseyin Coskun, Shahram Najam Syed, Andrey Konin, M. Zeeshan Zia, Quoc-Huy Tran
CVPR2
2020 Towards Anomaly Detection in Dashcam Videos
abstract
Inexpensive sensing and computation, as well as insurance innovations, have made smart dashboard cameras ubiquitous. Increasingly, simple model-driven computer vision algorithms focused on lane departures or safe following distances are finding their way into these devices. Unfortunately, the long-tailed distribution of road hazards means that these hand-crafted pipelines are inadequate for driver safety systems. We propose to apply data-driven anomaly detection ideas from deep learning to dashcam videos, which hold the promise of bridging this gap. Unfortunately, there exists almost no literature applying anomaly understanding to moving cameras, and correspondingly there is also a lack of relevant datasets. To counter this issue, we present a large and diverse dataset of truck dashcam videos, namely RetroTrucks, that includes normal and anomalous driving scenes. We apply: (i) one-class classification loss and (ii) reconstruction-based loss, for anomaly detection on RetroTrucks as well as on existing static-camera datasets. We introduce formulations for modeling object interactions in this context as priors. Our experiments indicate that our dataset is indeed more challenging than standard anomaly detection datasets, and previous anomaly detection methods do not perform well here out-of-the-box. In addition, we share insights into the behavior of these two important families of anomaly detection approaches on dashcam data.
Sanjay Haresh, Sateesh Kumar, M. Zeeshan Zia, Quoc-Huy Tran
IV2
2019 Focused Anchors Loss: cost-sensitive learning of discriminative features for imbalanced classification
abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) usually suffer performance penalties when there is a skewed label distribution. This phenomenon, class-imbalance, is most often mitigated peripheral to the classification algorithm itself, usually by modifying the amount of examples per class, for oversampling at the expense of computational efficiency, and for undersampling at the expense of statistical efficiency. In our solution, we combine discriminative feature learning with cost-sensitive learning to tackle the class imbalance problem by using a two step loss function, which we call the Focused Anchors loss (FAL). We evaluate FAL and its variant, Focused Anchor Mean Loss (FAML), on $6$ different datasets in comparison of traditional cross entropy loss and we observe a significant gain in balanced accuracy for all datasets. We also perform better than time-costly re-sampling and ensemble methods like SMOTE and Near Miss in $4$ out of $6$ datasets across F1-score, AUC-ROC and balanced accuracy. We also extend our evaluation to image domain and use long-tailed CIFAR$10$ to evaluate our loss function where we consistently report significant improvement in accuracy. We then go on to test our loss function under extreme imbalance on a propriety dataset and achieve a gain of $0.1$ AUC-ROC over the baseline.
Bahram K. Baloch, Sateesh Kumar, Sanjay Haresh, Abeerah Rehman, Tahir Qasim Syed
ACML2