Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philip A. Etter

dblp:254/0927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 87% Recommender systems · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
extreme multi-label ranking
0.612022
Enterprise-Scale Search: Accelerating Inference for Sparse Extreme Multi-Label Ranking Trees · WWW 2022
Information retrieval › search engines
semantic search
0.612022
Enterprise-Scale Search: Accelerating Inference for Sparse Extreme Multi-Label Ranking Trees · WWW 2022
Recommender systems
large-scale recommendation
0.212022
Enterprise-Scale Search: Accelerating Inference for Sparse Extreme Multi-Label Ranking Trees · WWW 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse matrix multiplication · 0.6parallelization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Enterprise-Scale Search: Accelerating Inference for Sparse Extreme Multi-Label Ranking Trees
abstract
Tree-based models underpin many modern semantic search engines and recommender systems due to their sub-linear inference times. In industrial applications, these models operate at extreme scales, where every bit of performance is critical. Memory constraints at extreme scales also require that models be sparse, hence tree-based models are often back-ended by sparse matrix algebra routines. However, there are currently no sparse matrix techniques specifically designed for the sparsity structure one encounters in tree-based models for extreme multi-label ranking/classification (XMR/XMC) problems. To address this issue, we present the masked sparse chunk multiplication (MSCM) technique, a sparse matrix technique specifically tailored to XMR trees. MSCM is easy to implement, embarrassingly parallelizable, and offers a significant performance boost to any existing tree inference pipeline at no cost. We perform a comprehensive study of MSCM applied to several different sparse inference schemes and benchmark our methods on a general purpose extreme multi-label ranking framework. We observe that MSCM gives consistently dramatic speedups across both the online and batch inference settings, single- and multi-threaded settings, and on many different tree models and datasets. To demonstrate its utility in industrial applications, we apply MSCM to an enterprise-scale semantic product search problem with 100 million products and achieve sub-millisecond latency of 0.88 ms per query on a single thread — an 8x reduction in latency over vanilla inference techniques. The MSCM technique requires absolutely no sacrifices to model accuracy as it gives exactly the same results as standard sparse matrix techniques. Therefore, we believe that MSCM will enable users of XMR trees to save a substantial amount of compute resources in their inference pipelines at very little cost. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/amzn/pecos , as well as our complete benchmarks and code for reproduction at https://github.com/UniqueUpToPermutation/pecos/tree/benchmark.
Philip A. Etter, Hsiang-Fu Yu, Lexing Ying, Inderjit S. Dhillon
WWW1