Shreya Ballijepalli

dblp:254/1086 · also Ballijepalli Shreya · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3932-6011ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Indexing and storage engines · 82% Information retrieval · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
b-tree
1.822026
An Evaluation of B-tree Compression Techniques · VLDB J. 2026
Revisiting B-tree Compression: An Experimental Study · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Indexing and storage engines › data compression
b-tree compression
1.822026
An Evaluation of B-tree Compression Techniques · VLDB J. 2026
Revisiting B-tree Compression: An Experimental Study · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
1.822026
An Evaluation of B-tree Compression Techniques · VLDB J. 2026
Revisiting B-tree Compression: An Experimental Study · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › database system benchmarking
index benchmarking
1.012026
An Evaluation of B-tree Compression Techniques · VLDB J. 2026
Information retrieval › indexing
index compression
0.812024
Revisiting B-tree Compression: An Experimental Study · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental study · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 An Evaluation of B-tree Compression Techniques
abstract
Abstract B-trees are widely recognized as one of the most important index structures in database systems, providing efficient query processing capabilities. Over the past few decades, many techniques have been developed to enhance the efficiency of B-trees from various perspectives. Among them, B-tree compression is an important technique introduced as early as the 1970s to improve both space efficiency and query performance. Since then, several B-tree compression techniques have been developed. However, to our surprise, we have found that these B-tree compression techniques were never compared against each other in prior works. Consequently, many important questions remain unanswered, such as whether B-tree compression is truly effective or not. If it is effective, under what scenarios and which B-tree compression methods should be employed? In this paper, we conduct an experimental evaluation of seven widely used B-tree compression techniques using both synthetic and real datasets. Based on our evaluation, we present lessons and insights regarding the use of B-tree compression that can be leveraged to guide system design decisions in modern databases.
Sikang Sun, Chuqing Gao, Shreya Ballijepalli, Jianguo Wang 0001
VLDB J.3
2024 Revisiting B-tree Compression: An Experimental Study
abstract
B-trees are widely recognized as one of the most important index structures in database systems, providing efficient query processing capabilities. Over the past few decades, many techniques have been developed to enhance the efficiency of B-trees from various perspectives. Among them, B-tree compression is an important technique introduced as early as the 1970s to improve both space efficiency and query performance. Since then, several B-tree compression techniques have been developed. However, to our surprise, we have found that these B-tree compression techniques were never compared against each other in prior works. Consequently, many important questions remain unanswered, such as whether B-tree compression is truly effective or not. If it is effective, under what scenarios and which B-tree compression methods should be employed? In this paper, we conduct the first experimental evaluation of seven widely used B-tree compression techniques using both synthetic and real datasets. Based on our evaluation, we present lessons and insights that can be leveraged to guide system design decisions in modern databases regarding the use of B-tree compression.
Chuqing Gao, Shreya Ballijepalli, Jianguo Wang 0001
Proc. ACM Manag. Data2