Taliah Muhammad

dblp:254/1190 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% 3D vision · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
brain encoding models
0.512021
Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.512021
A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
visual cortex modeling
0.512021
Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.512021
A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural system identification
0.512021
A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412019
Learning from brains how to regularize machines · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412019
Learning from brains how to regularize machines · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.112021
Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.112021
A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

normalizing flow · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0data-driven modeling · 0.5representational similarity · 0.4neural data regularization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Konstantin Willeke, Akshay K. Jagadish, Edgar Y. Walker, Santiago A. Cadena, Taliah Muhammad, Erick Cobos, Andreas S. Tolias, Alexander S. Ecker, Fabian H. Sinz
ICLR8
2021 A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images
abstract
We present a joint deep neural system identification model for two major sources of neural variability: stimulus-driven and stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. To this end, we combine (1) state-of-the-art deep networks for stimulus-driven activity and (2) a flexible, normalizing flow-based generative model to capture the stimulus-conditioned variability including noise correlations. This allows us to train the model end-to-end without the need for sophisticated probabilistic approximations associated with many latent state models for stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. We train the model on the responses of thousands of neurons from multiple areas of the mouse visual cortex to natural images. We show that our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in predicting the distribution of neural population responses to novel stimuli, including shared stimulus-conditioned variability. Furthermore, it successfully learns known latent factors of the population responses that are related to behavioral variables such as pupil dilation, and other factors that vary systematically with brain area or retinotopic location. Overall, our model accurately accounts for two critical sources of neural variability while avoiding several complexities associated with many existing latent state models. It thus provides a useful tool for uncovering the interplay between different factors that contribute to variability in neural activity.
Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Akshay K. Jagadish, Taliah Muhammad, Zhiwei Ding, Zhuokun Ding, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz
NeurIPS5
2019 Learning from brains how to regularize machines
abstract
Despite impressive performance on numerous visual tasks, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) --- unlike brains --- are often highly sensitive to small perturbations of their input, e.g. adversarial noise leading to erroneous decisions. We propose to regularize CNNs using large-scale neuroscience data to learn more robust neural features in terms of representational similarity. We presented natural images to mice and measured the responses of thousands of neurons from cortical visual areas. Next, we denoised the notoriously variable neural activity using strong predictive models trained on this large corpus of responses from the mouse visual system, and calculated the representational similarity for millions of pairs of images from the model's predictions. We then used the neural representation similarity to regularize CNNs trained on image classification by penalizing intermediate representations that deviated from neural ones. This preserved performance of baseline models when classifying images under standard benchmarks, while maintaining substantially higher performance compared to baseline or control models when classifying noisy images. Moreover, the models regularized with cortical representations also improved model robustness in terms of adversarial attacks. This demonstrates that regularizing with neural data can be an effective tool to create an inductive bias towards more robust inference.
Zhe Li 0002, Wieland Brendel, Edgar Y. Walker, Erick Cobos, Taliah Muhammad, Jacob Reimer, Matthias Bethge, Fabian H. Sinz, Xaq Pitkow, Andreas S. Tolias
NeurIPS5